[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [XEN PATCH v2 04/13] x86/vpmu: address violations of MISRA C Rule 16.3

To: Federico Serafini <federico.serafini@xxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2024 17:52:40 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, consulting@xxxxxxxxxxx, Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 00:52:47 +0000
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>

On Mon, 24 Jun 2024, Federico Serafini wrote:
> Add missing break statements to address violations of MISRA C Rule
> 16.3: "An unconditional `break' statement shall terminate every
> switch-clause".
> 
> No functional change.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Federico Serafini <federico.serafini@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>

References:
- [XEN PATCH v2 00/13] x86: address some violations of MISRA C Rule 16.3
  - From: Federico Serafini
- [XEN PATCH v2 04/13] x86/vpmu: address violations of MISRA C Rule 16.3
  - From: Federico Serafini

Prev by Date: Re: [XEN PATCH v2 03/13] x86/domctl: address a violation of MISRA C Rule 16.3
Next by Date: Re: [XEN PATCH v2 05/13] x86/traps: address violations of MISRA C Rule 16.3
Previous by thread: Re: [XEN PATCH v2 04/13] x86/vpmu: address violations of MISRA C Rule 16.3
Next by thread: [XEN PATCH v2 05/13] x86/traps: address violations of MISRA C Rule 16.3
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.