Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] xen: introduce common macros for per-CPU sections defintion

[Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 25/09/2024 10:23 am, oleksii.kurochko@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> On Tue, 2024-09-24 at 18:01 +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> On 24/09/2024 5:42 pm, Oleksii Kurochko wrote:
>>> Introduce PERCPU_BSS macro which manages:
>>>  * Alignment of the section start
>>>  * Insertion of per-CPU data sections
>>>  * Alignment and start/end markers for per-CPU data
>>> This change simplifies the linker script maintenance and ensures a
>>> unified
>>> approach for per-CPU sections across different architectures.
>>>
>>> Refactor the linker scripts for Arm, PPC, and x86 architectures by
>>> using
>>> the common macro PERCPU_BSS defined in xen/xen.lds.h to handle per-
>>> CPU
>>> data sections.
>>>
>>> No functional changes.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Oleksii Kurochko <oleksii.kurochko@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> Acked-by: Julien Grall <jgrall@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Acked-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> Changes in V2:
>>>  - rename PERCPU_SECTION to PERCPU_BSS
>>>  - update the commit message
>>>  - add Acked-by: Julien Grall <jgrall@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>  - add Acked-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>>
>>>  xen/arch/arm/xen.lds.S    |  9 +--------
>>>  xen/arch/ppc/xen.lds.S    |  9 +--------
>>>  xen/arch/x86/xen.lds.S    |  9 +--------
>>>  xen/include/xen/xen.lds.h | 10 ++++++++++
>>>  4 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>> Aren't you missing a hunk in riscv/xen.lds.S ?
> I thought it would be better to add a hunk in riscv when
> percpu_init_areas() will be called in RISC-V's start_xen().

If you didn't have the old form already, I'd agree.  But right now this
leaves RISC-V being the odd-architecture-out.

I can fix it on commit, to save another posting, if you're happy?

~Andrew