[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH] x86/APIC: Remove workaround Pentium 3AP APIC_ESR erratum
On Tue, Nov 26, 2024 at 08:58:59PM +0000, Andrew Cooper wrote: > The SDM instructs software to write 0 to ESR prior to reading it. However, > due to an original Pentium erratum, most logic skips the write based on there > being more than 3 LVTs; a stand-in to identify the Pentium. > > Xen, being 64bit, doesn't need compatibility for i586 processors. > > Introduce a new apic_read_esr() helper, quoting the SDM to explain why a > function named apic_read_esr() has a write in it too. > > Use the new helper throughout apic.c and smpboot.c, which allows us to remove > some useless reads of APIC_LVR. This in turn removes the external callers of > get_maxlvt(), so make it local to apic.c > > No practical change. > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx> Just a couple of nits. > --- > CC: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx> > CC: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx> > CC: Javi Merino <javi.merino@xxxxxxxxx> > > Based on Javi's patch correcting error_interrupt() > > Bloat-o-meter reports: > > add/remove: 0/1 grow/shrink: 0/3 up/down: 0/-269 (-269) > Function old new delta > get_maxlvt 48 - -48 > __cpu_up 1465 1417 -48 > clear_local_APIC 1109 1050 -59 > setup_local_APIC 942 828 -114 > --- > xen/arch/x86/apic.c | 29 ++++++++++------------------- > xen/arch/x86/include/asm/apic.h | 24 +++++++++++++++++++++++- > xen/arch/x86/smpboot.c | 17 ++++------------- > 3 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/apic.c b/xen/arch/x86/apic.c > index b4f542d25918..017d97054b06 100644 > --- a/xen/arch/x86/apic.c > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/apic.c > @@ -142,7 +142,7 @@ int get_physical_broadcast(void) > return 0xf; > } > > -int get_maxlvt(void) > +static int get_maxlvt(void) I think returning unsigned would be more natural here, IMO uint8_t would also be fine since it's the size of the field. > { > unsigned int v = apic_read(APIC_LVR); > > @@ -209,9 +209,7 @@ void clear_local_APIC(void) > apic_write(APIC_LDR, v); > } > > - if (maxlvt > 3) /* Due to Pentium errata 3AP and 11AP. */ > - apic_write(APIC_ESR, 0); > - apic_read(APIC_ESR); > + apic_read_esr(); > } > > void __init connect_bsp_APIC(void) > @@ -488,7 +486,7 @@ static void resume_x2apic(void) > > void setup_local_APIC(bool bsp) > { > - unsigned long oldvalue, value, maxlvt; > + unsigned long oldvalue, value; uint32_t would possibly be better here, since those are used to store the contents of a register, but would need changes in the print formatters. > int i, j; > > BUILD_BUG_ON((SPURIOUS_APIC_VECTOR & 0x0f) != 0x0f); > @@ -614,17 +612,13 @@ void setup_local_APIC(bool bsp) > value = APIC_DM_NMI | APIC_LVT_MASKED; > apic_write(APIC_LVT1, value); > > - maxlvt = get_maxlvt(); > - if (maxlvt > 3) /* Due to the Pentium erratum 3AP. */ > - apic_write(APIC_ESR, 0); > - oldvalue = apic_read(APIC_ESR); > + oldvalue = apic_read_esr(); > > value = ERROR_APIC_VECTOR; // enables sending errors > apic_write(APIC_LVTERR, value); > - /* spec says clear errors after enabling vector. */ > - if (maxlvt > 3) > - apic_write(APIC_ESR, 0); > - value = apic_read(APIC_ESR); > + > + value = apic_read_esr(); > + > if (value != oldvalue) > apic_printk(APIC_VERBOSE, > "ESR value before enabling vector: %#lx after: %#lx\n", > @@ -719,11 +713,9 @@ int lapic_resume(void) > apic_write(APIC_LVTT, apic_pm_state.apic_lvtt); > apic_write(APIC_TDCR, apic_pm_state.apic_tdcr); > apic_write(APIC_TMICT, apic_pm_state.apic_tmict); > - apic_write(APIC_ESR, 0); > - apic_read(APIC_ESR); > + apic_read_esr(); > apic_write(APIC_LVTERR, apic_pm_state.apic_lvterr); > - apic_write(APIC_ESR, 0); > - apic_read(APIC_ESR); > + apic_read_esr(); > local_irq_restore(flags); > return 0; > } > @@ -1389,8 +1381,7 @@ static void cf_check error_interrupt(void) > unsigned int i; > > /* First tickle the hardware, only then report what went on. -- REW */ I think the comment can be removed now, as there's no "tickle" in this context anymore? > - apic_write(APIC_ESR, 0); > - v = apic_read(APIC_ESR); > + v = apic_read_esr(); > ack_APIC_irq(); > > for ( i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(entries); ++i ) > diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/include/asm/apic.h b/xen/arch/x86/include/asm/apic.h > index d8eda6df6d86..337eb5cf6642 100644 > --- a/xen/arch/x86/include/asm/apic.h > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/include/asm/apic.h > @@ -151,6 +151,29 @@ static inline u32 get_apic_id(void) > return x2apic_enabled ? id : GET_xAPIC_ID(id); > } > > +static inline uint32_t apic_read_esr(void) > +{ > + /* > + * The SDM states: > + * Before attempt to read from the ESR, software should first write to > + * it. (The value written does not affect the values read subsequently; > + * only zero may be written in x2APIC mode.) This write clears any > + * previously logged errors and updates the ESR with any errors > detected > + * since the last write to the ESR. This write also rearms the APIC > + * error interrupt triggering mechanism. > + */ > + if ( x2apic_enabled ) > + { > + apic_wrmsr(APIC_ESR, 0); > + return apic_rdmsr(APIC_ESR); > + } > + else There's no need for the else case if the previous branch unconditionally ends with a return. Can reduce indentation. > + { > + apic_mem_write(APIC_ESR, 0); > + return apic_mem_read(APIC_ESR); > + } > +} > + > void apic_wait_icr_idle(void); > > int get_physical_broadcast(void); > @@ -161,7 +184,6 @@ static inline void ack_APIC_irq(void) > apic_write(APIC_EOI, 0); > } > > -extern int get_maxlvt(void); > extern void clear_local_APIC(void); > extern void connect_bsp_APIC (void); > extern void disconnect_bsp_APIC (int virt_wire_setup); > diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/smpboot.c b/xen/arch/x86/smpboot.c > index 79a79c54c304..7c77125fe715 100644 > --- a/xen/arch/x86/smpboot.c > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/smpboot.c > @@ -422,7 +422,7 @@ void asmlinkage start_secondary(void *unused) > static int wakeup_secondary_cpu(int phys_apicid, unsigned long start_eip) > { > unsigned long send_status = 0, accept_status = 0; > - int maxlvt, timeout, i; > + int timeout, i; You could make those unsigned I believe. Thanks, Roger.
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |