|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH] x86/APIC: Remove workaround Pentium 3AP APIC_ESR erratum
On Tue, Nov 26, 2024 at 08:58:59PM +0000, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> The SDM instructs software to write 0 to ESR prior to reading it. However,
> due to an original Pentium erratum, most logic skips the write based on there
> being more than 3 LVTs; a stand-in to identify the Pentium.
>
> Xen, being 64bit, doesn't need compatibility for i586 processors.
>
> Introduce a new apic_read_esr() helper, quoting the SDM to explain why a
> function named apic_read_esr() has a write in it too.
>
> Use the new helper throughout apic.c and smpboot.c, which allows us to remove
> some useless reads of APIC_LVR. This in turn removes the external callers of
> get_maxlvt(), so make it local to apic.c
>
> No practical change.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>
Just a couple of nits.
> ---
> CC: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>
> CC: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>
> CC: Javi Merino <javi.merino@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Based on Javi's patch correcting error_interrupt()
>
> Bloat-o-meter reports:
>
> add/remove: 0/1 grow/shrink: 0/3 up/down: 0/-269 (-269)
> Function old new delta
> get_maxlvt 48 - -48
> __cpu_up 1465 1417 -48
> clear_local_APIC 1109 1050 -59
> setup_local_APIC 942 828 -114
> ---
> xen/arch/x86/apic.c | 29 ++++++++++-------------------
> xen/arch/x86/include/asm/apic.h | 24 +++++++++++++++++++++++-
> xen/arch/x86/smpboot.c | 17 ++++-------------
> 3 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/apic.c b/xen/arch/x86/apic.c
> index b4f542d25918..017d97054b06 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/apic.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/apic.c
> @@ -142,7 +142,7 @@ int get_physical_broadcast(void)
> return 0xf;
> }
>
> -int get_maxlvt(void)
> +static int get_maxlvt(void)
I think returning unsigned would be more natural here, IMO uint8_t
would also be fine since it's the size of the field.
> {
> unsigned int v = apic_read(APIC_LVR);
>
> @@ -209,9 +209,7 @@ void clear_local_APIC(void)
> apic_write(APIC_LDR, v);
> }
>
> - if (maxlvt > 3) /* Due to Pentium errata 3AP and 11AP. */
> - apic_write(APIC_ESR, 0);
> - apic_read(APIC_ESR);
> + apic_read_esr();
> }
>
> void __init connect_bsp_APIC(void)
> @@ -488,7 +486,7 @@ static void resume_x2apic(void)
>
> void setup_local_APIC(bool bsp)
> {
> - unsigned long oldvalue, value, maxlvt;
> + unsigned long oldvalue, value;
uint32_t would possibly be better here, since those are used to store
the contents of a register, but would need changes in the print
formatters.
> int i, j;
>
> BUILD_BUG_ON((SPURIOUS_APIC_VECTOR & 0x0f) != 0x0f);
> @@ -614,17 +612,13 @@ void setup_local_APIC(bool bsp)
> value = APIC_DM_NMI | APIC_LVT_MASKED;
> apic_write(APIC_LVT1, value);
>
> - maxlvt = get_maxlvt();
> - if (maxlvt > 3) /* Due to the Pentium erratum 3AP. */
> - apic_write(APIC_ESR, 0);
> - oldvalue = apic_read(APIC_ESR);
> + oldvalue = apic_read_esr();
>
> value = ERROR_APIC_VECTOR; // enables sending errors
> apic_write(APIC_LVTERR, value);
> - /* spec says clear errors after enabling vector. */
> - if (maxlvt > 3)
> - apic_write(APIC_ESR, 0);
> - value = apic_read(APIC_ESR);
> +
> + value = apic_read_esr();
> +
> if (value != oldvalue)
> apic_printk(APIC_VERBOSE,
> "ESR value before enabling vector: %#lx after: %#lx\n",
> @@ -719,11 +713,9 @@ int lapic_resume(void)
> apic_write(APIC_LVTT, apic_pm_state.apic_lvtt);
> apic_write(APIC_TDCR, apic_pm_state.apic_tdcr);
> apic_write(APIC_TMICT, apic_pm_state.apic_tmict);
> - apic_write(APIC_ESR, 0);
> - apic_read(APIC_ESR);
> + apic_read_esr();
> apic_write(APIC_LVTERR, apic_pm_state.apic_lvterr);
> - apic_write(APIC_ESR, 0);
> - apic_read(APIC_ESR);
> + apic_read_esr();
> local_irq_restore(flags);
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -1389,8 +1381,7 @@ static void cf_check error_interrupt(void)
> unsigned int i;
>
> /* First tickle the hardware, only then report what went on. -- REW */
I think the comment can be removed now, as there's no "tickle" in this
context anymore?
> - apic_write(APIC_ESR, 0);
> - v = apic_read(APIC_ESR);
> + v = apic_read_esr();
> ack_APIC_irq();
>
> for ( i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(entries); ++i )
> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/include/asm/apic.h b/xen/arch/x86/include/asm/apic.h
> index d8eda6df6d86..337eb5cf6642 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/include/asm/apic.h
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/include/asm/apic.h
> @@ -151,6 +151,29 @@ static inline u32 get_apic_id(void)
> return x2apic_enabled ? id : GET_xAPIC_ID(id);
> }
>
> +static inline uint32_t apic_read_esr(void)
> +{
> + /*
> + * The SDM states:
> + * Before attempt to read from the ESR, software should first write to
> + * it. (The value written does not affect the values read subsequently;
> + * only zero may be written in x2APIC mode.) This write clears any
> + * previously logged errors and updates the ESR with any errors
> detected
> + * since the last write to the ESR. This write also rearms the APIC
> + * error interrupt triggering mechanism.
> + */
> + if ( x2apic_enabled )
> + {
> + apic_wrmsr(APIC_ESR, 0);
> + return apic_rdmsr(APIC_ESR);
> + }
> + else
There's no need for the else case if the previous branch unconditionally
ends with a return. Can reduce indentation.
> + {
> + apic_mem_write(APIC_ESR, 0);
> + return apic_mem_read(APIC_ESR);
> + }
> +}
> +
> void apic_wait_icr_idle(void);
>
> int get_physical_broadcast(void);
> @@ -161,7 +184,6 @@ static inline void ack_APIC_irq(void)
> apic_write(APIC_EOI, 0);
> }
>
> -extern int get_maxlvt(void);
> extern void clear_local_APIC(void);
> extern void connect_bsp_APIC (void);
> extern void disconnect_bsp_APIC (int virt_wire_setup);
> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/smpboot.c b/xen/arch/x86/smpboot.c
> index 79a79c54c304..7c77125fe715 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/smpboot.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/smpboot.c
> @@ -422,7 +422,7 @@ void asmlinkage start_secondary(void *unused)
> static int wakeup_secondary_cpu(int phys_apicid, unsigned long start_eip)
> {
> unsigned long send_status = 0, accept_status = 0;
> - int maxlvt, timeout, i;
> + int timeout, i;
You could make those unsigned I believe.
Thanks, Roger.
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |