[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v1 14/16] drivers/vuart: move simple MMIO-based UART emulator


  • To: dmkhn@xxxxxxxxx
  • From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2025 07:25:29 +0200
  • Autocrypt: addr=jbeulich@xxxxxxxx; keydata= xsDiBFk3nEQRBADAEaSw6zC/EJkiwGPXbWtPxl2xCdSoeepS07jW8UgcHNurfHvUzogEq5xk hu507c3BarVjyWCJOylMNR98Yd8VqD9UfmX0Hb8/BrA+Hl6/DB/eqGptrf4BSRwcZQM32aZK 7Pj2XbGWIUrZrd70x1eAP9QE3P79Y2oLrsCgbZJfEwCgvz9JjGmQqQkRiTVzlZVCJYcyGGsD /0tbFCzD2h20ahe8rC1gbb3K3qk+LpBtvjBu1RY9drYk0NymiGbJWZgab6t1jM7sk2vuf0Py O9Hf9XBmK0uE9IgMaiCpc32XV9oASz6UJebwkX+zF2jG5I1BfnO9g7KlotcA/v5ClMjgo6Gl MDY4HxoSRu3i1cqqSDtVlt+AOVBJBACrZcnHAUSuCXBPy0jOlBhxPqRWv6ND4c9PH1xjQ3NP nxJuMBS8rnNg22uyfAgmBKNLpLgAGVRMZGaGoJObGf72s6TeIqKJo/LtggAS9qAUiuKVnygo 3wjfkS9A3DRO+SpU7JqWdsveeIQyeyEJ/8PTowmSQLakF+3fote9ybzd880fSmFuIEJldWxp Y2ggPGpiZXVsaWNoQHN1c2UuY29tPsJgBBMRAgAgBQJZN5xEAhsDBgsJCAcDAgQVAggDBBYC AwECHgECF4AACgkQoDSui/t3IH4J+wCfQ5jHdEjCRHj23O/5ttg9r9OIruwAn3103WUITZee e7Sbg12UgcQ5lv7SzsFNBFk3nEQQCACCuTjCjFOUdi5Nm244F+78kLghRcin/awv+IrTcIWF hUpSs1Y91iQQ7KItirz5uwCPlwejSJDQJLIS+QtJHaXDXeV6NI0Uef1hP20+y8qydDiVkv6l IreXjTb7DvksRgJNvCkWtYnlS3mYvQ9NzS9PhyALWbXnH6sIJd2O9lKS1Mrfq+y0IXCP10eS FFGg+Av3IQeFatkJAyju0PPthyTqxSI4lZYuJVPknzgaeuJv/2NccrPvmeDg6Coe7ZIeQ8Yj t0ARxu2xytAkkLCel1Lz1WLmwLstV30g80nkgZf/wr+/BXJW/oIvRlonUkxv+IbBM3dX2OV8 AmRv1ySWPTP7AAMFB/9PQK/VtlNUJvg8GXj9ootzrteGfVZVVT4XBJkfwBcpC/XcPzldjv+3 HYudvpdNK3lLujXeA5fLOH+Z/G9WBc5pFVSMocI71I8bT8lIAzreg0WvkWg5V2WZsUMlnDL9 mpwIGFhlbM3gfDMs7MPMu8YQRFVdUvtSpaAs8OFfGQ0ia3LGZcjA6Ik2+xcqscEJzNH+qh8V m5jjp28yZgaqTaRbg3M/+MTbMpicpZuqF4rnB0AQD12/3BNWDR6bmh+EkYSMcEIpQmBM51qM EKYTQGybRCjpnKHGOxG0rfFY1085mBDZCH5Kx0cl0HVJuQKC+dV2ZY5AqjcKwAxpE75MLFkr wkkEGBECAAkFAlk3nEQCGwwACgkQoDSui/t3IH7nnwCfcJWUDUFKdCsBH/E5d+0ZnMQi+G0A nAuWpQkjM1ASeQwSHEeAWPgskBQL
  • Cc: andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx, anthony.perard@xxxxxxxxxx, julien@xxxxxxx, michal.orzel@xxxxxxx, oleksii.kurochko@xxxxxxxxx, roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx, sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx, dmukhin@xxxxxxxx, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Delivery-date: Wed, 25 Jun 2025 05:25:50 +0000
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>

On 25.06.2025 00:54, dmkhn@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 24, 2025 at 09:40:02AM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 24.06.2025 09:36, dmkhn@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jun 24, 2025 at 07:53:04AM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 24.06.2025 05:57, dmkhn@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>>>>> --- a/xen/drivers/vuart/Kconfig
>>>>> +++ b/xen/drivers/vuart/Kconfig
>>>>> @@ -3,6 +3,15 @@ config HAS_VUART
>>>>>
>>>>>  if (ARM_32 || ARM_64)
>>>>>
>>>>> +config HAS_VUART_MMIO
>>>>> + bool "Simple MMIO-based emulated UART support"
>>>>
>>>> Perhaps in a separate change this should be renamed. HAS_* should never
>>>> have prompts.
>>>
>>> Oh, so HAS_ flags are non-interactive selectors by design?
>>
>> Well "has" simply by the word means "this is available". Any user-selectable 
>> item
>> deriving from the mere availability would then have a "depends on HAS_...", 
>> thus
>> hiding the option in situation where the functionality isn't available (be 
>> it per
>> arch or for other reasons).
> 
> I see there's a lot of drivers (UARTs) which are selectable by the user via
> HAS_ symbols (drivers/char/Kconfig), e.g:
> 
> CONFIG_HAS_NS16550:

Iirc it was prompt-less up to some point. And when the prompt was added, the 
name
wasn't changed / split. Other UARTs then followed suit (when they shouldn't 
have).

Jan



 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.