[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] RE: [Xen-users] Badness in softirq.c / no modules loaded / related tonetwork interface
> On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 06:40:33PM +0200, > sebastian@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > I have a porblem with the unprivileged kernel. When I start > my domain > > using the unprivileged kernel I get the message: > > > > Badness in local_bh_enable at kernel/softirq.c:140 [<c011f3c0>] > > local_bh_enable+0x80/0x90 [<c0223089>] skb_checksum+0x129/0x2a0 > > [<c026736c>] udp_poll+0x9c/0x150 [<c021e409>] sock_poll+0x29/0x40 > > [<c016ba3e>] do_select+0x25e/0x2d0 [<c016b630>] > __pollwait+0x0/0xd0 > > [<c016bd9f>] sys_select+0x2bf/0x4d0 [<c01093f4>] > syscall_call+0x7/0xb Are these messages coming out on the dom0 or domU console? Can you repeat on 2.0-testing or unstable? Does anyone see this that's using a NIC other than an e1000? Thanks, Ian > We are still having this problem too. We only have it on > some hosts, not others so its related to some activity in the > domUs - we haven't figured out what though. The backtrace > suggests UDP traffic > > I'm prety sure we didn't miscompile our modules - I > disassembled them to check for cli/sti. The kernel was compiled using > > make-kpkg --arch xen --append_to_version -xen > --revision=2.6.11 kernel_image > > We see this with the e1000 driver, using kernel 2.6.11.7 + > debian patches + xen stable 2.0.5, on dell poweredge 750 hardware. > > No functionality appears to be affected, other than 1000s of > these messages in the log. > > -- > Nick Craig-Wood <nick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- > http://www.craig-wood.com/nick > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-users mailing list > Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users > _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |