[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-users] xen 2.0.6 + kernel 2.6.11 + raid1 = strange behavior

To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: Dániel Vásárhelyi <asdmin@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 21:57:41 +0100
Delivery-date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 20:57:58 +0000
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=R3rbTiqyW0CB2zfCMizVmR4kyAr6GcKU1YM+eUOZQUf6i36XRuIxin0o0ZjpbBHe+NRPGiKH/cVLVSAUd1FYuOCdCb/QYJWgcx65m0duGik53FC00U4hyqtZjhAWC452O5236UN8UQ/cuGrxyvzzI+z+Et/qkrCASrmi58gVFXs=
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>

I tried with 2.4.30 + 2.0.7 xen, but it's also not able to boot :(
init just stops executing betseen rcS and rc2.

The config is in the attachment

--
Dániel Vásárhelyi
http://www.nsfw.hu/ | http://www.tophost.hu/

Attachment: config-2.4.30-xen0
Description: Binary data

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

References:
- [Xen-users] xen 2.0.6 + kernel 2.6.11 + raid1 = strange behavior
  - From: Dániel Vásárhelyi
- Re: [Xen-users] xen 2.0.6 + kernel 2.6.11 + raid1 = strange behavior
  - From: jeremy avnet
- Re: [Xen-users] xen 2.0.6 + kernel 2.6.11 + raid1 = strange behavior
  - From: Dániel Vásárhelyi

Prev by Date: Re: [Xen-users] Error "Device 0 (vif) could not be connected"
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-users] can't start domU
Previous by thread: Re: [Xen-users] xen 2.0.6 + kernel 2.6.11 + raid1 = strange behavior
Next by thread: [Xen-users] kexec into a new Dom0 Xen kernel possible?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.