[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-users] Has my FreeBSD DomU actually crashed?

  • To: Geoff Buckingham <geoffb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Kip Macy <kip.macy@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2005 23:29:07 -0600
  • Cc: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Delivery-date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 05:29:15 +0000
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=L7BAg9LhctACqd29XpySb8RRtH0ug7fdUnUB0Q1sC+2Dumhm4RgU+yPoVegHzJZzySN+tHyvjQlpTwbp7dsDyoDX6PIN61X/D0bWTizQscDqGG5+iqtsf3kdn7rhHqytHgQhz1+JaoymrcYs2WtKynLjeSseSiz/Xqmxo9oBFQw=
  • List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>

It is hypothetically a problem. It isn't relevevant - it is actually a bit of brain-damagedness in the taskqueue API. I'll get around to removing its use at some point.


This is obviously the documented behaviour of the witnes code, but is it a real
problem or just a feature of the xen architecture?

Is it actually relevent as that file is not one of those modifired?

Xen-users mailing list



Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.