[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-users] Has my FreeBSD DomU actually crashed?
- To: Geoff Buckingham <geoffb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- From: Kip Macy <kip.macy@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2005 23:29:07 -0600
- Cc: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 05:29:15 +0000
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=L7BAg9LhctACqd29XpySb8RRtH0ug7fdUnUB0Q1sC+2Dumhm4RgU+yPoVegHzJZzySN+tHyvjQlpTwbp7dsDyoDX6PIN61X/D0bWTizQscDqGG5+iqtsf3kdn7rhHqytHgQhz1+JaoymrcYs2WtKynLjeSseSiz/Xqmxo9oBFQw=
- List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
It is hypothetically a problem. It isn't relevevant - it is actually a
bit of brain-damagedness in the taskqueue API. I'll get around to
removing its use at some point.
-Kip
This is obviously the documented behaviour of the witnes code, but is it a real
problem or just a feature of the xen architecture?
Is it actually relevent as that file is not one of those modifired?
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
