[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-users] Re: Custom DomU kernel
- To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- From: "BB Mailing list" <bb.mlist@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 17:55:49 +0200
- Delivery-date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 08:56:35 -0700
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=Xz12sOIJ3Iib3ieMhf8OLECf5N8JdF4zYdW1CV4DtW9J+HpkV5FWOKkXbwR6s8Q6o4HngpwHGaG92rUkgXxW7zmX0PFoUwQ/D1cFOSvDUELfSkBWApwBEuoOBNs4AuWYWV8BudrKlqsnDdH4ID/MZtgJmp+4R2WkLSx5So+ITa8=
- List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
Hi,
Thanks for the quick reply - what would a lot of hard
work imply? Having this configuration and the RHAS image running was
quite a lot of hard work as well, so I'm not scared
:)
Figuring out how to
apply the patches developed by Xen for 2.6 onto a 2.4 kernel, and fix
any problems that arise from the fact that the 2.4 kernel is different
from 2.6, so you may need patches in different places than they are for
2.6. The xen 2.0 hypervisor has patches for Linux 2.4 kernels, so you
may be able to get an idea of how it works from that - but the Xen 2.0
hypervisor is different from 3.0 in several aspects, which would mean
that the patches need to be different - so if you compare the 3.0
patches for 2.6 and 2.0 patches for 2.6, you'd see how different (and I
haven't done this) the patches are for the different Xen versions. Based
on that, you should be able to determine what the work needed for 2.4
is... But since there hasn't been any announcement of such a patch being
available, I suspect it's not trivial...
--
Mats
Right - sounds like fun. What if I use Xen 2 on my 2.6 kernel in
place of Xen 3? Would that even be possible?
I guess that is a
possibility - but you'll be missing some of the new features - which of
course may be less important if you don't need any of them...
:-)
Since I work on HVM, I sort
of can't choose - it's 3.0.x that works, and nothing previously...
--
Mats
Quentin.
Okay, sounds like I got some options. What if I want to use HVM (which I
never heard about before, sorry I am really not a hardware guy hehe) ? How can
I make sure my hardware supports this? Do you have some pointers?
<Advert> Buy some AMD Opteron in Socket F.
</Advert>
Otherwise, there are AMD Athlon64 and Intel processors available
that support AMD-V and Intel VT respectively. For the AMD parts it's
relatively easy: Don't buy a Sempron, and as long as it's got DDR2
memory interface, you'll have AMD-V. Apparently, the Intel story isn't so
straight-forward, they have a number of conditions that all need to be
fulfilled together, including the "right" BIOS and/or
motherboard...
--
Mats
Thanks
!
Quentin
Well I'm afraid I don't have much choice, we're setting this up on Dell Poweredge Xeon servers - seems I will have to either run Xen 2 on the Ubuntu 2.6, either start over with the RHAS 3 as Dom0.
Thanks for the help, much appreciated.
Cheers,
Quentin.
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
