[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-users] xen: when devices go away...

  • To: "Steve Wray" <steve.wray@xxxxxxxxx>
  • From: "Jerry Amundson" <jamundso@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2007 06:49:04 -0600
  • Cc: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Delivery-date: Fri, 02 Feb 2007 04:48:57 -0800
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=G6hWrOMf8ut3vgTsP26DnPHD6rPU53anvenL7Q976vZG4C7FM19GC793JXkKFQvny1vd3wuiFEZF02Q1sMDbhcoE5a7j+wmsrKjaNw7S39eU0FF5pK7jTFMsQTBaX+fSF6xYZOBws8hiIWESu6IUYzMPOtm9YxtCaU4icE9B7g8=
  • List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>

On 2/1/07, Steve Wray <steve.wray@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi there,
I've been experimenting with iscsi and xen and have found an interesting

I'd reasoned that using iscsi volumes as devices in a software RAID1
configuration would be a Good Idea since when one of the iscsi servers
goes away the filesystem is stable.

Note todays thread "Linux software RAID1 (Dom0 or domU)?" ....


"Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain!"

Xen-users mailing list



Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.