[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-users] Xen domU's and iscsi initaitor problems.

  • To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • From: "Ryan Kish" <rpkish@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 16:13:16 -0700
  • Delivery-date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 15:12:41 -0800
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=OOiKNsR58zF89XgwfI8i1e+BzkUkio2Z0++jTRb8x0fAEexL1vFfGMShR7l6GX3HM6oWI3ekhnOStDm5sFSOwQ+IuFF4IHFPXJnG2YfhbG5LkrzLDVJaPYDVJhtnFNhKgEGHiJCktdii622+jrJGxysqWe6n6Fcvnt//dKsKGpU=
  • List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>

Right - the dom0's are iscsi initiators...
Theorizing here, but it's possible that the CPU and network overhead
in dom0 is not conducive to putting iscsi, which itself is CPU and
network overhead, within the domU.

I could not see the forest for the trees. Things work much better on dom0 :)
Many thanks Jerry.


Xen-users mailing list



Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.