[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-users] Windows domU on a no HVM CPU

  • To: Roger Klorese <roger@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Nico Kadel-Garcia <nkadel@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2007 09:56:27 +0100
  • Cc: Velten Spägele <xen@xxxxxxxxx>, xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Delivery-date: Sat, 14 Apr 2007 01:53:48 -0700
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=VXblO1HhjsdYTUalbz7YT9Y/lRlO2cb8vdOViC+hTfKgd/TF7Z2UlLJ22g051x95Fe1bILBN2TO9kdrwqIBUgH6rYv1NE6eqbQ787hLEtT/Uy1ABf7rAcufMK+/DeRRgBMonyKU8GLBAXoKz9180IG8E8K/JQVdE65/ZYEXp5rk=
  • List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>

Roger Klorese wrote:
But *WHY* do you want to run a no-longer-supported, no more security patches OS? Do you really need that much pain?

Because you run applications that run on Windows 2000?

And I can try and put a little man on my car to shovel coal into the steam engine. It means continuing to use a steam engine, of course.

There are sometimes reasons to keep old software apps running, but they can cost quite a lot of time and effort. I deal with this regularly and professionally: it also adds up to a lot money, often far more than properly porting or re-writing the app in a new environment.

Xen-users mailing list



Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.