[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-users] Running XEN in redundant setup.

  • To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • From: "Sten Fredriksson" <stenfredriksson@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 07:55:25 +0200
  • Delivery-date: Mon, 02 Jul 2007 22:53:37 -0700
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=obDpl0BS7evupvNO2IcWZI7kTv31n7nZkSeXgBiWY6wmx43psRSG/Mm64tchUMO6fl5RPTFhQvNfcQSRVlwuRjhdUiLFkvll0sN5AAEiiTW73n1yrWTzV3Il3WTLWJyiwv/uTIRmOuHApFRataZ/aI3Kp4ktgRMbrkOX/FUyT20=
  • List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>

On 7/2/07, Zimbra <carl@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I'm using a San to share disks over iscsi.  Redhat's cluster suite
wouldn't work for me so I went with oracle's ocfs2.  I then used
heartbeat2 to with an active-active configuration.  It works great.
With bonded interfaces it's particularly stable.

Sounds interesting, do you have any more details or pointers to share?
This sounds like a setup that would fit very well.

.Geetings Sten

Xen-users mailing list



Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.