[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-users] at the end of my wits
Hi, > I have determined that my problem seems to be occuring during the > ramdisk's (initrd) loading of modules, before the kernel even gets to > start booting. There's problems with the ata drivers. The thing is, > no amount of remaking or fiddling with my initrd contents seems to fix > this, but I'm no Linux guru so maybe there is a fix. > I'm no expert either. although we seem to have the same problem, I think mine is IRQ related. comparing dmesg and cat /proc/interrupts I could see (from memory) that the sata device conflicted with pci-x bus, so I changed the sata setting in the bios to compatible (S-ATA only). a USB hub conflicted with pci-x video card, so I disactivated usb funcionality in the bios. One NIC conflicted with an IRQ that I could see come up during boot using dmesg, but wasn't present in /proc/interrupts, so I removed it anyway and activated the onboard NIC. (luckily that didn't create any new conflicts). So, now I've got s server with no cdrom or usb, but Xen boots 100% of the time! (fingers crossed). After looking at sooo many threads I get the feeling that the hipervisor or dom0 (I don't know which), gets a corrupt acpi table from the bios. > Chris, does your system use an initrd or does it boot straight from > the kernel? This might be useful information, although I don't know > what it would tell us at this point. I'm not too up on the boot process. kernel /xen.gz dom0_mem=512M module /vmlinuz-2.6.18-xen root=/dev/md2 ro console=tty0 module /initrd.img-xen-3.1.0 I think the hipervisor boots (don't know how) and calls dom0 which then boots itself on the initramfs. or something like that. > I have determined that my problem seems to be occuring during the > ramdisk's (initrd) loading of modules, Same here, it all happens before the switchroot. Hey Steve, if you've still got that machine around and can be bothered, who knows? I seemed to have stumbled out of a problem I still can believe I really had! Anyway, I've had two of these bad eggs in a row (I still haven't tried this on p5pdelux) and it makes me wonder what I should be looking out for when I buy a motherboard. God's blessing? Cheers. Chris. On 7/3/07, David Greenberg <dgrnbrg@xxxxxxx> wrote: I believe that certain parts of the chipset are unsupported in kernel 2.6.18. Ubuntu feisty has Xen ported to 2.6.19, and that will successfully boot on the Asus motherboard 100% of the time. I got it to boot and recognize all 7 internal sata drives I was using. There is a potential bug that may affect you if you use driver domains, however. I didn't isolate the bug, but be aware that it potentially exists (softraid corruption when using a driver domain with 6 usb controllers and the only graphics card passed to it). Cheers, David On 7/3/07, Steve Brueckner <steve@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Chris Fanning wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I'm at the end of my wits. > > I desperately need some ideas. > > > > Not long ago I posted here with problems booting xen on a P5Pdeluxe > > motherboard. > > When I boot this machine with vanilla debian etch, there are no > > problems. > > > > ata1: SATA link up 3,0 Gpb (SStatus 123 Scontrol 200) > > ata1: qc timeout (cmd 0xec) > > ata1: failed to identify (I/0 error, err_mask = 0x0104) > > ata1: port is slow to resond, please be patient > > ata1: failes to respond (30 secs) > > ata1: COMRESET failed, device not ready > > ata1: hardreset failded > > > > But this doesn't always happen. 50% of the time, the process stalls > > for about 6 secs on. > > ACP: PCI Interrupt 0000:00:1f.2[B] -> GSI 19 (low level) -> IRQ 18 > > And then continues correctly. > > > > The machine also stalls during boot at usb hub detection, and NIC > > detection (or loading module). > > > > Well, I gave up, thought it was some weird hardware issue, and > > decided to use that machine as my own PC (because it boots etch just > > fine). > > > > So I started afresh with an asus P5LD2 and I've got exactly the same > > problem.!! > > > > The only thing that these two machines have in common is the > > powercord and I've changed that too! > > > > I'm not new to Xen, I've installed at least 15 since 3.0.1 These > > problems occur with my own compiled kernels and the debian packaged > > kernels. > > > > Any ideas please? > > > > Chris. > > Sorry, no help from me. I just wanted to say I'm still in the same > boat as you, although I use Fedora and a Dell Optiplex 745 machine. > > Mine boots about 5% of the time; I wish it would boot 50% of the time! > My errors are similar to yours but not identical due to different > distro. I can boot the vanilla Fedora 7 kernel, but not the Fedora 7 > Xen kernel package or the manually compiled Xen kernel. > > What do we have in common? Error messages during or immediately > before or after ata detection. Both the 965 and 945 chipsets lack > native ata support, so it's either not present (in my case) or tacked > on with a 3rd party device by motherboard manufacturers (in your > case). In both cases, however, it seems Xen can cause a lot of > trouble with detecting ata, whether it's physically present or not. > Others have posted that Xen works fine with their 965 boards, so > unfortunately this isn't a consistent problem. > > I have determined that my problem seems to be occuring during the > ramdisk's (initrd) loading of modules, before the kernel even gets to > start booting. There's problems with the ata drivers. The thing is, > no amount of remaking or fiddling with my initrd contents seems to fix > this, but I'm no Linux guru so maybe there is a fix. > > Chris, does your system use an initrd or does it boot straight from > the kernel? This might be useful information, although I don't know > what it would tell us at this point. > > I believe we've dismissed the previously suggested notion that this is > a hardware problem, since you and I have had it on 3 separate models > of boards. I've flashed my BIOS to the latest version, and done as > much troubleshooting as I know how, but still no luck fixing it. > > All I can think to do is wait for the next release of a new Xen kernel. > I'd love it if someone could give us a better option, though. > > Steve Brueckner, ATC-NY > > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-users mailing list > Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users > _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |