[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [Xen-users] XEN - Broadcom issue: survey


  • To: <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: "Boudreau Luc" <luc.boudreau@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 11:06:24 -0500
  • Delivery-date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 08:07:14 -0800
  • List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
  • Thread-index: Acgm1+keABTXPywTQNm2+9U+YP/WlwAACHJA
  • Thread-topic: [Xen-users] XEN - Broadcom issue: survey

Just to keep you informed, I'm downloading the HP firmware update CD to test 
the firmware update on my server. Maybe this will fix my "Broadcom issue". The 
problem is, 650mb at 9k/s takes a while... I'll post to the list once done.

______________________________________________________

Luc Boudreau
Registrariat, Université de Montréal


-----Message d'origine-----
De : xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
[mailto:xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] De la part de Pezza
Envoyé : 14 novembre 2007 11:03
À : xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Objet : Re: [Xen-users] XEN - Broadcom issue: survey


Ivan,

I don't konw how to replicate the test on my machine (I use Xen 3.1
opensource, thus I don't think I can run a windows PV guest on it, and I
don't know if it applies also to Linux VMs), but I wouldn't be surprised if
this issue was related to non-PV guests.

I'm surprised to see that you're running the same firmware version of my
"good" machine and still have the problem: at this point, I really don't
know what else we could try.

The only other thing is that I didn't try with Xen 3.0.4 (the same running
on my XenExpress machine): maybe 3.1 has a flaw with these network card? Or
maybe there's a "hidden fix" in the XenExpress supplied kernel?

                                                                                
   
M.



Ivan Porro wrote:
> 
> Sorry to make the counter-example but I have:
> 
> ~# ethtool -i peth0
> driver: bnx2
> version: 1.4.51b
> firmware-version: 2.9.1
> bus-info: 0000:04:00.0
> 
> this driver is the one relased by DELL on Nov. 11, and I have packet 
> drop. The same with driver 1.5.1c from broadcom
> 
> The strange thing is that TX-DRP is 0 until I start a domain. Since I 
> start an HVM, TX-DRP for its vif start incresing.
> 
> If I start an PV machine, it drop only 20 packets and then stop. No more 
> TX-DRP at all...
> 
> So, to isolate the problem, it is related to HVM machine only. At least 
> in my case.
> 
> Ivan
> 
> Pezza wrote:
>> Hey,
>> 
>> please note that if you're using the tg3 driver, it means you're using
>> NetXTreme *not* NetXTreme II (the latter is using the 5708/5706 chipsets,
>> the former some previous releases). 
>> The problem has been observed (but I'd like some confirmations here ;-))
>> using the bnx2 driver, which is specific to NetEXtreme II.
>> 
>> To make sure what driver/version/firmware you're using you can run
>> 'ethtool
>> -i eth0' (replace eth0 with the ethernet device you want to show).
>> 
>> In my case, the "bad" machine shows:
>> 
>> [root@sofia ~]# ethtool -i peth0
>> driver: bnx2
>> version: 1.5.10c
>> firmware-version: 1.9.3
>> bus-info: 0000:03:00.0
>> 
>> while the "good" machine shows:
>> [root@camogli scripts]# ethtool -i eth0
>> driver: bnx2
>> version: 1.5.1c
>> firmware-version: 2.9.1
>> bus-info: 0000:08:00.0
>> 
>> As I said before, the only relevant difference I can find between the 2
>> machines is the eth0 firmware version, but I don't now if and how I can
>> update it on the other one (ref to my previous message for the complete
>> details on the good and bad machine configuration).
>> 
>>                                                                              
>>                            
>> M.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> mangoo wrote:
>>> Ivan Porro schrieb:
>>>> I totally agree with Luc Boudreau about this problem.
>>>>
>>>> On modern branded server they ALL use Broadcom chipset... I must admit 
>>>> that:
>>>>
>>>> a) lot of people are experiencing the problem but can tolerate it
>>>>
>>>> or
>>>>
>>>> b) someone already experienced this problem and solved it
>>> Too bad you started a new topic without even trying to describe what 
>>> your problem with broadcom chipsets is?
>>>
>>> I'm running Xen 3.1 (2.6.18 kernel), compiled from sources, on HP 
>>> ProLiant DL320 G3. It uses tg3 for its network cards.
>>>
>>> Works fine.
>>>
>>> 06:01.0 Ethernet controller: Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme BCM5704 
>>> Gigabit Ethernet (rev 10)
>>> 06:01.1 Ethernet controller: Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme BCM5704 
>>> Gigabit Ethernet (rev 10)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> Tomasz Chmielewski
>>> http://lists.wpkg.org
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Xen-users mailing list
>>> Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
>>>
>>>
>> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> http://www.bio.dist.unige.it
> voice: +39 010 353 2789
> fax:   +39 010 353 2948
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-users mailing list
> Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/XEN---Broadcom-issue%3A-survey-tf4798603.html#a13749943
Sent from the Xen - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.