[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-users] VMWare vs. Xen, is the conflict by VMware deliberate?


  • To: "Nico Kadel-Garcia" <nkadel@xxxxxxxxx>
  • From: "Ndex Server" <ndex.srvr@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 11:42:57 -0800
  • Cc: xen list <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Javier Guerra <javier@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Delivery-date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 11:43:39 -0800
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=dCfFv9fcTirxhB2EowkNj7kp4DMRWIlW5283MgQ6ITzCjp0FmQ2OzsKg9KPCFRVdIS5SdgT53tAJMHY7XdhFI96aPMxIKOVfaZJgyRErlRCRjoQ5nZR8iEPcWBN/z80QZ0GWPmIM/oXhJSSz2DR8BOoFTzNjEk2h399jd34QHsM=
  • List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>

VMware is a fully functional, full featured virtualization engine.  It supports hardware and paravirtualization.
 
You don't run Xen *and* VMware together, that's the equivalent of running Solaris NIS+ inside Linux chroot.
 
VMware is a *closed* source commercial product which does provide a few open source packages.  Xen is an open source project which (under their new Citrix masters) also provides commercial products.
 
The reason to choose Xen over VMware are the same reason you'd choose Linux over Solaris.  Cost, support services and access to the open source. 
 
What you're suggesting is running nested hypervisors, there's NO performance advantage, no security advantage, no virutalization advantage.
 
What you are trying to do is completely illogical -- the VMware hypervisor and the Xen hypervisor cannot *both* own ring0.
 
Load a VMware Server instance on a Linux 32 bit host (on EM64T hardware) with VMX enabled then load an EM64T Guest, sent debug = "TRUE" in the guest .vmx configuration file and read the vmware.log output file. 
 
Full virtualization.
 
Then burn the box and invite everyone to the party.
 
Cheers,
ndex
 
 
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 12:38 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia <nkadel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Javier Guerra wrote:
> On 2/18/08, Nico Kadel-Garcia <nkadel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> The bit about refusing to run with a Xen hypervisor in place was very
>> clear, however. It might be justified, but the refusal to even try to
>> start up seemed excessively harsh. I'm happy to accept a warning that
>> what I'm about to attempt with my software is a bad idea, but I want a
>> reference to exactly what the problem is or at least the ability to try
>> it, anyway, after insisting on the warning.
>>
>
> in most cases, "check; but try anyway" would be a serious bug IMO.
>
> if you're trying to run VMWare on PV, 'trying' would definitely fail,
> and quite possibly crash the whole system.  that's because PV doesn't
> emulate hardware, not even close.
>
> if it's refusing to run on HVM... well, it _should_ run, possibly with
> some limitations, and big overhead... but run.  then i would say it's
> not nice on VMWare's part
>
>
Javier, I was trying to do this on Dom0, not inside a DomU. I'll take a
shot at a fully Xen virtualized DomU runn VMWare inside it, as soon as I
get a few cycles.

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.