[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [Xen-users] Windows 2008

  • To: "'Joseph L. Casale'" <jcasale@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: "Venefax" <venefax@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 3 May 2008 18:10:12 -0400
  • Cc: Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Delivery-date: Sat, 03 May 2008 15:11:11 -0700
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer:thread-index:content-language; b=jBKOE3A2vSUYzpIY0ksR2aCkDnyE5M0LHADHWG25VI98qGCx3uq8nLQLqbQLrzRdtKXkMPR/cEW9z9HJk77l/99bhuF8xqQKyxYz3zh5mzGarCYtU1Ij7+fu0GCvjLeDqFt0T3+jcvOfLlzZjmZRGDgOXTKe1vcUizFpxKjPVCI=
  • List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
  • Thread-index: AcitRSQQfIpbIh3lTraQoJPn2zrLNAAI/yFvAAA777A=

Can you please send me detailed steps on how you installed xen 3.2.0 on
Centos 5.1 64 Bits? I tried and failed. I am getting a box with 16 cores and
128 GB, so I feel it is necessary to use Xen 3.2.0. And I will install also
Windows 2008. The question is: Is SQL 2005 server going to work or the
performance hit is unacceptable?

-----Original Message-----
From: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Joseph L. Casale
Sent: Saturday, May 03, 2008 6:01 PM
To: Mark Williamson; xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [Xen-users] Windows 2008

>I'm not clear whether "Enlightened 2008 Server" is some kind of sub-version
>of "2008 Server" or whether Enlightenment support is included by default.

A trustworthy source told me all sku's of Windows 2008 Server and Vista are
enlightened by default.

Xen-users mailing list

Xen-users mailing list



Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.