[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [Xen-users] Should I use bridged or routed networking?

  • To: "xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: "Joseph L. Casale" <JCasale@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 23:28:54 -0600
  • Accept-language: en-US
  • Acceptlanguage: en-US
  • Delivery-date: Tue, 20 May 2008 22:29:32 -0700
  • List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
  • Thread-index: Aci65ffxrHsnpkswTGaDMZD+v0i9gAAHUlEw
  • Thread-topic: [Xen-users] Should I use bridged or routed networking?

>I’m very comfortable with Asterisk and moderately experienced with Shorewall, but still rather new to Xen and am having difficulty visualizing the proper network config to use.  Bridged? Routed? With a handful of servers and switches I’m sure I’d manage much better, but that’s not >very efficient. :-) Anyone have any suggestions?  Thanks!


I have this setup running similarly, I used a CentOS51 pv guest to run shorewall and a bridged config. So easy…

Food for thought,

Xen-users mailing list



Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.