[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [Xen-users] Xensource VM in Xen


  • To: Xen-user List <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: "Joseph L. Casale" <JCasale@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 21:43:08 -0600
  • Accept-language: en-US
  • Acceptlanguage: en-US
  • Delivery-date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 20:43:43 -0700
  • List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
  • Thread-index: Acjyu5cWCymUTaK0TbutSKTLKLJXfAAA2Rpg
  • Thread-topic: [Xen-users] Xensource VM in Xen

>> As for the Asterisk idea, my experience so far is that it sort of works, but 
>> not reliably enough for production, and I tried for a while. Don't do it...
>>
>
>Out of curiosity, what is the problem with Asterisk running on Xen?

The timing issue which is theoretically only needed when using a hardware 
interface or conferencing and MOH from what I understand.
Bottom line is the ztdummy hack when not using hardware (I don't know of it 
will passthrough reliably) yields less then reliable results in xen.

I tried many vanilla centos installs on different xen 3.2.0 setups that all 
produced an asterisk server that missed/dropped calls or just plain was not 
consistent.

Moving the asterisk setup into a non virtualized environment produced more than 
one server with duplicate configs that all worked perfectly and have never 
missed a beat yet.

jlc

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.