|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-users] Debian domU interface naming strangeness
That worked great. Thanks! On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 6:10 PM, Stephen Kent <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Ray: > > Debian and most distros with udev keep a record of previously observed > interfaces in /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules. If you don't > specify a MAC address for the domU in your config, Xen will create a random > MAC and assign it to your domU, which will then think it's a new interface. > Delete 70-persistent-net.rules in your domU and change your vif= line so it > includes mac=00:16:3E:3D:A0:30 in the configuration, and reboot the domU. > It should recognize eth0 as the same interface every boot. > > - Stephen > > On Thu, 31 Jul 2008 17:52:04 -0400, "Ray Barnes" <tical.net@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: >> Hi all. I've got a Debian domU I created from scratch a few weeks >> ago. Every time I rolled it out previously in testing, it worked >> fine. But now it seems to make the ethernet device eth1 rather than >> eth0 in the domU: >> >> localhost:~# ifconfig -a >> eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:16:3E:3D:A0:30 >> BROADCAST MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 >> RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 >> TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 >> collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 >> RX bytes:0 (0.0 b) TX bytes:0 (0.0 b) >> >> lo Link encap:Local Loopback >> inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0 >> UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1 >> RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 >> TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 >> collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 >> RX bytes:0 (0.0 b) TX bytes:0 (0.0 b) >> >> localhost:~# dmesg|grep -i eth >> netfront: Initialising virtual ethernet driver. >> netfront: device eth0 has flipping receive path. >> localhost:~# >> >> Note that as eth1, it routes traffic just fine. I can ifconfig it up >> and set an IP address, then get good routed connectivity. I'm seeing >> this eth1 naming issue on dom0s running CentOS 5.0 with the stock Xen >> 3.0.3 (yes that means literally 5.0, not a higher minor number), as >> well as Cent 5.1 with Xen 3.2.0 compiled from source. But obviously >> it presents a problem since I can't count on consistent naming. >> >> Thoughts? >> >> -Ray >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Xen-users mailing list >> Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users > > _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
 |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |