[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-users] new on xen.

  • To: "Robert Dunkley" <Robert@xxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Mauro <mrsanna1@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 09:47:08 +0100
  • Cc: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Delivery-date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 00:47:51 -0800
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references; b=MUggd+LEh8gL4V/u6FbDmbOOqICNo7H923dctzHffWvz9epS5iyGyu4dnpC19f4YnH mHYl0b10HG79rPdI0jLBG5EviVxoFfC2AIL7aRZezGp4aZk9c8nPkTLO1YaYKNxqOdmn tdW5RKIJ6Kjdw+2hMs6ryR6jwDCXe4vGR4U0g=
  • List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>


2008/11/13 Robert Dunkley <Robert@xxxxxxxxx>

Hi Mauro,

 

You would need to partition  the arrays in LVM if you needed more VMs. In the end it comes down to convenience versus performance, individual Raid 1s perform best when multiple VMs come under load but one large Raid array is easier to manage.


ok, thanks anche scuse me if I reply directly to you, I forget to do a reply-all.
Last thing...do you suggest only raid1 stripes instead of raid1+0?
Because my controller give me raid5 and raid1+0 choices.
I have a Smart Array P400 SAS/SATA Controller in a HP Proliant DL 580 G5.


_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

 

©2013 Xen Project, A Linux Foundation Collaborative Project. All Rights Reserved.
Linux Foundation is a registered trademark of The Linux Foundation.
Xen Project is a trademark of The Linux Foundation.

Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.