[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-users] I want to know if.....


  • To: Venefax <venefax@xxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Mauro <mrsanna1@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 00:40:18 +0100
  • Cc: jonr@xxxxxxxxxx, xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Delivery-date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 15:41:18 -0800
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=bqm1XrpQtgakq8fnXO9C8sETbDspMy/CZyEvAg+vfwVTaIlozoOo32ItvPKkA+BzlI 1AzAYWNK0B6ZTm1ZCgXdOPhzN3IvN0tA5eRvRcKoCxS4GlQglIOi5Vr33YFASFlBzOjQ YEilTVZ/qWfV6beaM/Ta5ORZ+zYTcZWHR8NiA=
  • List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>

2009/2/27 Venefax <venefax@xxxxxxxxx>:
> It is not true at all. KVM and Xen are fundamentally different and address
> different problems. Xen allows for fast para-virtualization of Linux Domus,
> while KVM only fully-virtualizes. Nobody in his right mind would use KVM for
> a linux DOMu, because it would lose 75% of its performance, compared to
> para-virtualization. So KVM is for windows on Xen, but it will never replace
> Xen in the datacenter.
> Federico

Sorry for my ignorance but...can you explain?
I think pure virtualization gains more in performances vs para virtualization.

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.