[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Xen-users] VT-D On An Asus P5E-VM DO


  • To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • From: Michael MacLeod <mikemacleod@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 19:01:19 -0400
  • Delivery-date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 16:02:07 -0700
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=DBdEiiBcYjKCGl0A3zpIpfpvErTOl+QNd0KpLCSdBfpPDop3BZP1yXzpPHuyAXY3zM AwpayYxsE0wipeakWGULWkorPOfzSP9vpADrDHb1j40QGg6J8FnpPLZPzLdezZ4+d4JP 3Ct/bx6ERyDT/k/25CAaVczm3lOAkwceAKVys=
  • List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>

Hello,

I've been trying to get VT-D working on my Xen installation for the last few days. I've got an Asus P5E-VM DO motherboard, which is explicitly listed on the VTdHowTo page of the wiki as supporting VT-d, and a Core 2 Quad CPU. I'm using Debian as my dom0 OS, and I've built Xen 3.4.1 from source.

The error I'm getting now is:
(XEN) [VT-D]dmar.c:388: RMRR error: base_addr d0000000 end_address cfffffff
(XEN) Failed to parse ACPI DMAR.  Disabling VT-d.

A little googling suggests this is a BIOS issue. I recently upgraded my BIOS to the latest version in order to see if that would resolve a different problem (it didn't), so now I'm wondering if VT-D would be working on an older BIOS revision.

Anyone with an Asus P5E-VM DO and VT-D working care to tell me which revision their BIOS is?

Cheers,
Mike
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.