[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-users] streaming server on a virtual machine.


  • To: Jeff Sturm <jeff.sturm@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Mauro <mrsanna1@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 11:42:54 +0200
  • Cc: xen-users <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Delivery-date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 02:43:34 -0700
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=F3vX+Op42BXeaZHFEubSq27BUJOznbXsux51lqvafo/KnVAJgEA1NSX5uaMso1PyE5 2URiDmeTRoxuagunS7BTZHOamOZfGLSqMPyPWg31slLsF54ViL9B5fkIzZ86vCPTSgMB Icbfdz7tuBe4Bov8qy0Oz5g7DG7FtcBuBLeIg=
  • List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>

2009/9/18 Jeff Sturm <jeff.sturm@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> I don't see why not.  If you're concerned about latency you could always
> pin the server to a physical CPU.
>
> (Lately we've been doing a lot of physical-to-virtual migrations, and
> I've found myself asking: "What kinds of servers do we have that should
> never be virtual?"  There aren't many on that list.)
>
You say that a streaming server can be installed on a virtual machine.
I don't want to create any kind of disturb but I've asked the same
question to the KVM mailing list and they said that a streaming server
(I user red5), due to the high I/O traffic, it must absolutely not
virtualized.

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.