[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-users] config.sxp pain - auto start?
Hi,Yes, its the same script and they call the same thing which is diff on each system. So my conventional Centos 5 system has virt-manager 0.5.3-10 and libvirt 0.3.3-1, found at the Centos repos. Where as my Gitco-ized Centos 5 system has virt-manager 0.7.0-1 and libvirt 0.7.0-6. These packages were updated using the Gitco 3.4.1 repo so I know they are in the Xensource domain. I think Xensource fundamentally changed domU config methodology and I can see the advantages of setting startup behavior within a domU config file because sym links are too easy to blow away. Its too bad the SXP format is like pig latin and looks more like code. - Brian On Oct 8, 2009, at 3:26 PM, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote: On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 3:29 AM, Brian Krusic <brian@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:One big problem I see is consistency. Wether GUI or CLI, in 3.4.1, SXP is the default.Last time I check virt-install is not part of Xen. It's a separate project by Redhat.And I personally have to assume others will need to manage this Xen infrastructure I've sold management on and have created.I do it the old-fashioned way : create old-style config files and symlinks manually :DSo I must conform to the way of SXP unfortunately. It does make things more complicated at first glance. Just my thoughts.Ask Redhat to have "on_xend_start/stop" parameter configurable when creating new guests? Also ask Xen developers to have a new "xm" command that can change the value of "on_xend_start/stop" without having to delete - edit - recreate domU? -- Fajar _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |