Re: [Xen-users] config.sxp pain - auto start?

[Brian Krusic <brian@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi,

I just noticed something diff between the 2 systems, the plain Centos  
5 system that is completely up to date and the Centos 5 system having  
the Gitco repo.
The virt-install on the Centos system is 566 lines and the Gitco one  
is 937.
Since they both have RHEL as the author I assume they both came from  
Redhat but why is the Gitco system diff?
I did an update on my plain Centos system and it didn't suck down a  
newer version of the script.
Any ideas?  Am I looking at this completely wrong?

- Brian

On Oct 8, 2009, at 3:26 PM, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:

> On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 3:29 AM, Brian Krusic <brian@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > One big problem I see is consistency.
> > Wether GUI or CLI, in 3.4.1, SXP is the default.
> Last time I check virt-install is not part of Xen. It's a separate
> project by Redhat.
>
> > And I personally have to assume others will need to manage this Xen
> > infrastructure I've sold management on and have created.
> I do it the old-fashioned way : create old-style config files and
> symlinks manually :D
>
> > So I must conform to the way of SXP unfortunately.
> >  It does make things more
> > complicated at first glance.
> > Just my thoughts.
> Ask Redhat to have "on_xend_start/stop" parameter configurable when
> creating new guests?
> Also ask Xen developers to have a new "xm" command that can change the
> value of "on_xend_start/stop" without having to delete - edit -
> recreate domU?
>
> --
> Fajar
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-users mailing list
> Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users