[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-users] Questions on qcow, qcow2 versus LVM
On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 11:56 PM, Matthew Law <matt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > # domU backing store > lvcreate -C y -L 10G -n myvm VolGroupVM > parted /dev/VolGroupVM/myvm mklabel msdos > parted /dev/VolGroupVM/myvm mkpartfs primary ext2 0 1024000 > kpartx -p "" -av /dev/VolGroupVM/myvm > tune2fs -j /dev/mapper/myvm1 > kpartx -d /dev/VolGroupVM/myvm hmm ... kpartx -d part looks OK. I use something like lvcreate mkfs.ext3 no parted/kpartx involved, since the filesystem and swap is directly on the LV > > # domU swap > lvcreate -C y -L 512 -n myvm-swap VolGroupVM > parted /dev/VolGroupVM/myvm-swap mklabel msdos > parted /dev/VolGroupVM/myvm-swap mkpartfs primary linux-swap 0 512 > mkswap /dev/mapper/VolGroupVM-myvm--swapp1 > lvscan | sort | grep ${NAME} what, no "kpartx" here? Not even "kpartx -a"? How did you get /dev/mapper/VolGroupVM-myvm--swapp1, was it automatically created by parted without the need to manually run kpartx? > Then it is basically a case of (from memory): > > mount -t ext3 /dev/mapper/myvm1 /mnt/vminstall > tar -xzf /home/vmimages/image.tar.gz -C /mnt/vminstall > umount /mnt/vminstall looks good. > I have cobbled together these commands based on what I have read at > various places. Have I screwed up somewhere? I'd say the biggest difference from my setup is that you use partitions with parted and kpartx. I haven't tested that, but it might be your source of problem. Try partionless setup that I mentioned earier to narrow down the source of problem. -- Fajar _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |