RE: [Xen-users] Vlan and Xen

[Nathan Eisenberg <nathan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I've been doing a bit of this lately, and I've found I've been most comfortable 
with doing the tagging inside the domU, as if it were a regular server that was 
doing tagged traffic.  There are advantages to doing it in Dom0, I'm sure, but 
it was far easier for me to just do it normally.

Best Regards,
Nathan Eisenberg


> -----Original Message-----
> From: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:xen-users-
> bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Fajar A. Nugraha
> Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2010 2:08 PM
> To: Juan Pablo Lorier
> Cc: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Vlan and Xen
> 
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 12:35 AM, Juan Pablo Lorier
> <jplorier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > I'm using bonding + vlan in a couple of servers. I managed to get a
> > script from redhat to create the bridges from the bond+vlan (bond0.x)
> > but I'm not shure which is the best way to do this;
> >
> > - I have created the ethx inside the domu from each bond0.x vlan
> interface
> > - Or should I use only one bridge (to bond0) and the inside the domu
> create
> > the eth0.x vlan interfaces?
> 
> Both can work, depending on your needs. For example if domU is a
> "normal" server then it's easier to do vlans inside dom0. However if
> the domU is a firewall connected to many network/vlans, it's easier to
> simply assign the trunk and do vlans inside domU.
> 
> --
> Fajar
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-users mailing list
> Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
> 
> 



_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users