[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Xen-ia64-devel] Re: [Fedora-ia64-list] content removed from cowboyhatlinux.org site
Maybe I should have followed these signals earlier, my response is really slow ... but I didn't have clear picture about how the whole thing works among involved vendors and their interests, and I simply couldn't devote my time enough for this even if I knew. So, almost a year later Red Hat decided to abandon Itanium and Xen (will it change much after Tukwila ?) ... when you say Debian, you mean Suse, and it hasn't got Xen on IA64 yet - maybe it will have it in the future ? HP is not just more Debian-centric, it develops low sensitivity towards linux and open source in general. Recent advance about HP's BladeSystem (Matrix) SIM s/w infrastructure includes support for Hyper-V, VMWare and XenServer virtualization platforms - KVM or Xen not even announced, but OS support remains (RHEL, Suse). On the other hand, I am interested in SAP (also supports RHEL and Suse, and Xen, too) and Oracle roadmaps which still welcome Linux and open source as critical business models. For me it is not option to leave Itanium at the moment, and I would like to see what is the future of Xen and Linux commercial distros on it in future. Here is what I have at the moment, more will follow on soon: http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/weblogs?blog=/pub/wlg/17592 ZP. 2009/4/17 John L. Bass <jbass@xxxxxxxx> I agree Redhat managment are being idiots here, after all this is _______________________________________________ Xen-ia64-devel mailing list Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |