|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-users] Xen dom0 on debian, what is the most recent but stable solution?
Hi,my post will not directly answer your problem. Try to use virsh-manager. It is a nice GUI with which you will be able to do Virtualization even on a server which does not have a GUI running on it. If you consider using it post here I will reply. Which Distribution you are using. On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 7:11 PM, Fantu <fantonifabio@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Thanks for the good reply, yesterday on dell t610 i try xen 4.0.1-rc1 with > kernel 2.6.32.13 pv_ops last build (last commit > f6fe6583b77a49b569eef1b66c3d761eec2e561b) with this config: > http://old.nabble.com/file/p28668520/config-2.6.32.13 config-2.6.32.13 > Boot very long and system useless > Today i have move the same disk to other system not dell, the only problems > see with not dom0_mem=...M and balloning of dom0 is low performance if after > start of some domU dom0 ram go to 1.4gb approximately and freeze of dom0 > (calltrace of out of memory, i can't log to this system without SOL) when go > to 900mb approximately with open of another domU > But now with dom0_mem=2048M and dom0 balloning set to no is all ok and good > performance > Can you recommend me good config for do this system working also on dell > server? > Thanks for any reply > > Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: >> >> On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 11:50:23AM -0400, Mike Viau wrote: >>> > On Mon, 24 May 2010 15:13:00 +0300 <pasik@xxxxxx> wrote: >>> > >>> > Remember Linux 2.6.32 pvops dom0 kernels require at least Xen 4.0 to >>> work properly. >>> > Upcoming Xen 3.4.3 will (partly) support pvops dom0 kernels aswell.. >>> > >>> >>> Pasi, I thought that the xen 3.4.3 xen hypervisor was supposed to work >>> on >>> pvops kernels. I had a 2.6.32 pvops kernel working, altough some users >>> reported problems on the list with this combination. I also believe >>> 2.6.31 >>> pvops was tested to work as well. Personally 2.6.33 pvops is untested. >>> >> >> 2.6.31 pvops dom0 doesn't require the new IOAPIC related hypercalls. >> >> 2.6.32 and newer pvops dom0 kernels require the new IOAPIC hypercalls from >> Xen. >> Xen 4.0.0 was the first one to introduce that hypercall. >> >> Some of the patches related to it are backported to Xen 3.4.3, but not >> all. >> >> Based on the various discussion on xen-devel it seems Xen 3.4.3 + 2.6.32 >> pvops dom0 >> works for some, and doesn't for others. >> >> It's recommended to use Xen 4.0.0 + 2.6.32 pvops dom0, since that's the >> supported >> and recommended configuration. >> >> -- Pasi >> >>> -M >>> >>> >>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> >>> 30 days of prizes: Hotmail makes your day easier! [1]Enter now >>> >>> References >>> >>> Visible links >>> 1. http://go.microsoft.com/?linkid=9729704 >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Xen-users mailing list >> Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users >> >> > > -- > View this message in context: > http://old.nabble.com/Xen-dom0-on-debian%2C-what-is-the-most-recent-but-stable-solution--tp28656145p28668520.html > Sent from the Xen - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-users mailing list > Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users > -- Tapas _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
 |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |