[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-users] Re: Considering Xen for Ubuntu VPS environment

  • To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • From: George Shuklin <george.shuklin@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2010 22:48:59 +0400
  • Delivery-date: Thu, 02 Sep 2010 11:50:07 -0700
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:from:to:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date:message-id :mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; b=weVGNmvEj4VYgzZls4AvdAHnKpkU8SeieGDB2WQ3i6vEb4UpY6aKitgop5jNyW8Qqd y8t7IM1vfFLqlp1fG6m6v+VwU4H3Jl/I+9eklBnxF4yKHknOwnMA75Knk/RtiKHVylNb BjjPKEPlkTpkOj1mAyrOnYaLIxzanuZS1GjYo=
  • List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>

It's different technologies. Xen can use VT - this mode called 'HVM' and
it does not need for pv_ops. And Xen can use paravirtualization mode
(which one is much faster than HVM), and it CAN use pv_ops kernel for
guest (but oldschool -xen- kernel IMHO better).

> Does pv_ops use Intel VT or AMD-V (hardware-assisted virtualization)? I heard 
> that might get around some of the limitations Virtuozzo has locked us into.

Xen-users mailing list



Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.