[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Xen-users] Xen on Ðluster File System


  • To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • From: sybasesql@xxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 15:18:19 +0300
  • Delivery-date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 05:20:34 -0700
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; b=IZ80DFjX7GJ6JD7O1OIvKVeJYJxmKGk0jaAS3/Yqa9eN052kSMYxfhhrGsZo03md4d JmekTayMmUDAp2WE8ar4Lf68OY66D3LgjmrGI16s1j3SODMrcUuRBd6lVIQmoVQ00FfF LqroXtTvbXfFYMprdTDHQzSclE585Fo6qJ5CA=
  • List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>

Dear All.

I have a new project to create a real big xen cluster on many supermicro twin2u2 servers.
The main types of services will be cloud computing and cloud data storage, like amazon ec2 and s3.

For cloud data storage I plan to use a cluster file system, which will be located on the same xen servers.
Each compute node will have 3TB of SAS2 data storage in Hardware RAID 10 with BBU (6 x 2.5" 1TB SAS2).
Using the cluster file system due to the fact that I want to achieve maximum data reliability through redundancy storage sites on xen nodes and in case of failure of one node to redirect the clients who use it to other nodes until the replacement of failure node.

- Does anyone have a similar experience to run xen cluster on cluster file system?
- What is the cluster file system is better to use: OCFS2, GFS, LUSTRE, others?
- Will there be any problems with disk IO capacity and CPU usage when using a cluster file system?
- If this solution is not suitable, what solution can be used as an alternative (SAN/NAS with iSCSI or something else)?

Thanks in advance.
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.