[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-users] Finally cracked the mystery of motherboards with Vt-d support

  • To: toth@xxxxxxxxxx
  • From: Claudiu CurcÄ <alexstrasza2@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 14:08:37 +0300
  • Cc: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Delivery-date: Fri, 20 May 2011 04:13:34 -0700
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=HcHqq6m7kgPS1iDmvC5g/Zxtnd+NWX8cMFHQ5bQdOoKCzuH1Otw46W/15sDJH+X1cj 6s6aRy43R7FzV2ICBvAVLABtB4MhuvzJzOlX+DWiAOGupdOKPPgUKmd2V2Tw3wrALWyR YjEencYeYDf43HvZNAzclSwjxBHSAAmghet7o=
  • List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>

2011/5/20 "Mgr. Åimon TÃth" <toth@xxxxxxxxxx>:
>> Well, desktop boards will always be inferior in terms of performance
>> and features, compared to server boards, so it's not something
>> surprising that only a handful of them support this tech. Desktop
>> boards have low-cost as target rather than features for the
>> enthusiastic power user. That's why I suggested it, because I'm using
>> it in my own desktop computer.
> The problem is that Xeons are totally useless on workstations. Core i7
> processors have ton more features and are much more suited for this
> environment.

Sorry, but that's just FUD... Recent Xeons and i7s are quite close in
terms of performance. The only major differences is that Xeons have 2
QPI buses in order to accomodate dual-processor setups and have ECC
support, while the only place where i7 really shines compared to Xeon
is TurboBoost, especially when activated on all 4 cores.


However, I can understand that the price difference might be a
definitive factor in your choice... as ECC ram and the CPUs themselves
are quite pricey.

Xen-users mailing list



Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.