Xen project Mailing List

Re: [Xen-users] Alternative to network-nat on Debian Squeeze with XEN4?

To: Andrew Sorensen <andrewx192@xxxxxxxxx>

From: Todd Deshane <todd.deshane@xxxxxxx>

Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 20:59:28 -0400

Delivery-date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 18:00:50 -0700

Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=ERJQgVjE+XD6OHcEJpMYkL19NNer5yglzzIKUsetq+E8fSf2UcHNSLk8uoBRkKtC7Y jxpcaUI0cYjPARErHD/da3b3VZXiPB+Qb/ZqruoYuHiKORvpOro421XxzqVogKPaTJRw asIKFPCUqNylBc+HIVdZNQky/oJNkvZPzducQ=

List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>

On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 2:20 PM, Andrew Sorensen <andrewx192@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > ----- Original message ----- >> >> >> --- On Sun, 6/19/11, Andrew Sorensen <andrewx192@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> > From: Andrew Sorensen <andrewx192@xxxxxxxxx> >> > Subject: [Xen-users] Alternative to network-nat on Debian Squeeze with >> > XEN4? To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> > Date: Sunday, June 19, 2011, 12:38 AM > >> > Hello, >> > >> > Are there any good alternatives to the network-nat script >> > on Debian >> > Squeeze? >> > I have tried using (network-script network-nat) and >> > (vif-script >> > vif-nat), but I end up >> > with an error message like >> > >> > Error: Device 1 (vif) could not be connected. ip addr add >> > 10.0.1.259 dev >> > vif4.1 failed >> > >> > with configuration file directive >> > >> > vif =[ 'script=vif-nat,ip=10.0.1.132' ] >> > >> > I need Internet access for my DomU's but I cannot assign >> > each one a >> > public IP address due to limited addressing. >> >> If using xen < 4.1, then it should work with this network >> >> network 10.0.0.0 >> gateway 10.0.0.254 >> >> Whatever ip you pass to vif needs a static setup in the guest. >> >> -- >> Mark > > Right, but I cannot even start the DomU because of that error. > Should I go about creating a vlan on the host and bridge to the vlan behind > NAT? I'm not sure how best to do that. > I'm wondering if we should considering using a QEMU-like approach for NAT on Xen going forward? Something like: http://wiki.qemu.org/Documentation/Networking/NAT Thoughts? Thanks, Todd > _______________________________________________ > Xen-users mailing list > Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users > -- Todd Deshane http://www.linkedin.com/in/deshantm http://www.xen.org/products/cloudxen.html http://runningxen.com/ _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

©2013 Xen Project, A Linux Foundation Collaborative Project. All Rights Reserved.
Linux Foundation is a registered trademark of The Linux Foundation.
Xen Project is a trademark of The Linux Foundation.