[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-users] Alternative to network-nat on Debian Squeeze with XEN4?

  • To: Xen User-List <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: "Fajar A. Nugraha" <list@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 10:37:07 +0700
  • Delivery-date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 20:38:25 -0700
  • List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>

On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 7:59 AM, Todd Deshane <todd.deshane@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 2:20 PM, Andrew Sorensen <andrewx192@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> > Hello,
>>> >
>>> > Are there any good alternatives to the network-nat script
>>> > on Debian
>>> > Squeeze?

> I'm wondering if we should considering using a QEMU-like approach for
> NAT on Xen going forward?
> Something like:
> http://wiki.qemu.org/Documentation/Networking/NAT
> Thoughts?

Todd: Is this the same one used by libvirt with virbr0? Using
something common would be nice, as it means NAT-networking can be
treated the same way as bridge networking from Xen's perspective.

Andrew: try installing virt-manager (or perhaps libvirt-bin is
enough). It should create a bridge called virbr0, which you can use on
domU config file (add "bridge" section to vif line).


Xen-users mailing list



Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.