| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
 Re: [Xen-users] Alternative to network-nat on Debian Squeeze with	XEN4?
 
To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxFrom: Andrew Sorensen <andrewx192@xxxxxxxxx>Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 19:02:02 -0700Delivery-date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 19:03:48 -0700Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;	h=from:reply-to:to:subject:x-mailer:references:in-reply-to	:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version;	b=RZkRrzn94/gtYteyqwbZ4GyaJIY00vKRNNaQej/Frl4I5uMoWuhoe6joFWM5toOi/b	JF6eKhVCkaCJe/p77QxXc15+gzsRNZ72jQeiH8gBUgwlc3ouMpO7GkOMhjojaHEj3y0e	r88p/kFzj7hvT5ydlSx758iubVQUnhsI3rRb0=List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com> 
 ----- Original message -----
> On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 2:20 PM, Andrew Sorensen <andrewx192@xxxxxxxxx>
 > wrote:
 > > ----- Original message -----
 > > >
 > > >
 > > > --- On Sun, 6/19/11, Andrew Sorensen <andrewx192@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
 > > >
 > > > > From: Andrew Sorensen <andrewx192@xxxxxxxxx>
 > > > > Subject: [Xen-users] Alternative to network-nat on Debian Squeeze
 > > > > with XEN4? To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
 > > > > Date: Sunday, June 19, 2011, 12:38 AM
 > >
 > > > > Hello,
 > > > >
 > > > > Are there any good alternatives to the network-nat script
 > > > > on Debian
 > > > > Squeeze?
 > > > > I have tried using (network-script network-nat) and
 > > > > (vif-script
 > > > > vif-nat), but I end up
 > > > > with an error message like
 > > > >
 > > > > Error: Device 1 (vif) could not be connected. ip addr add
 > > > > 10.0.1.259 dev
 > > > > vif4.1 failed
 > > > >
 > > > > with configuration file directive
 > > > >
 > > > > vif =[  'script=vif-nat,ip=10.0.1.132' ]
 > > > >
 > > > > I need Internet access for my DomU's but I cannot assign
 > > > > each one a
 > > > > public IP address due to limited addressing.
 > > >
 > > > If using xen < 4.1, then it should work with this network
 > > >
 > > > network 10.0.0.0
 > > > gateway 10.0.0.254
 > > >
 > > > Whatever ip you pass to vif needs a static setup in the guest.
 > > >
 > > > --
 > > > Mark
 > >
 > > Right, but I cannot even start the DomU because of that error.
 > > Should I go about creating a vlan on the host and bridge to the vlan
 > > behind NAT? I'm not sure how best to do that.
 > >
 >
 > I'm wondering if we should considering using a QEMU-like approach for
 > NAT on Xen going forward?
 >
 > Something like:
 > http://wiki.qemu.org/Documentation/Networking/NAT
 >
 > Thoughts?
 >
 > Thanks,
 > Todd
 >
 > > _______________________________________________
 > > Xen-users mailing list
 > > Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
 > > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
 > >
 >
 >
 >
 > --
 > Todd Deshane
 > http://www.linkedin.com/in/deshantm
 > http://www.xen.org/products/cloudxen.html
 > http://runningxen.com/
 Well, that script isn't going to work in it's as-is condition because my WAN uplink is a bridge now. (So that some DomU can have their own assigned IP adressing.)
 
 _______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users 
 |