Re: [Xen-users] Server purchase pointers

[Bart Coninckx <bart.coninckx@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 02/24/12 10:58, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 4:53 PM, Bart Coninckx<bart.coninckx@xxxxxxxxxx>  wrote:
> > On 02/24/12 05:35, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 10:10 PM, Bart Coninckx
> > > <bart.coninckx@xxxxxxxxxx>    wrote:
> > > > Also, it might be so that both nodes in the future will be geographically
> > > > separated, so I third one is less convenient,
> > > geo-separated nodes, running drbd protocol C? Good luck :P
> > no problem, I have 100 mbit guaranteed between two datacenters.
> The problem is not bandwidth. It's latency (which pretty much kills
> sync performance). Async aren't affected by latency, which is why I
> prefer using async wherever possible. Even at the cost of live
> migration.
>
> Again, if you've tested that it fits your requirement, or your
> workload is extremely low, then you should be fine.
I've been assured that the line performs close to a LAN connection.

And, as you state, in case of problems A is still possible.

no worries,

b.




_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-users