[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-users] NUMA nodes and cpu layout
Am 15.06.2018 um 15:15 schrieb Dario Faggioli: > On Fri, 2018-06-15 at 00:19 +0200, Stefan Kadow wrote: >> When booting the default Debian kernel, the command "numactl -- >> hardware" >> returns the following: >> available: 8 nodes (0-7) >> node 0 cpus: 0 1 2 3 32 33 34 35 >> node 0 size: 0 MB >> node 0 free: 0 MB >> node 1 cpus: 4 5 6 7 36 37 38 39 >> node 1 size: 32170 MB >> node 1 free: 31758 MB >> node 2 cpus: 8 9 10 11 40 41 42 43 >> node 2 size: 0 MB >> node 2 free: 0 MB >> ... > >> I want pools of 8 cpus each, but which cpus should be combined for >> optimal performance? >> >> Solution 1) from numactl >> cpus="0-3,32-35" >> >> Solution 2) from xl cpupool-numa-split >> cpus="0-7" >> > What George said. Check also the output of `xl info -n', hopefully that > will clarify things a bit (on how Xen sees things). Yes, the numbering of xen tools is different from the numbers numactl outputs, I understand that. I attached the complete output of "xl info -n" and the output of "xl dmesg". You will find the output of "numactl --hardware" in my first post. > On a not so related note, you seem, at least according to numactl, to > have nodes with no RAM, is that correct/done on-purpose? I saw that, too. But I didn't do that. It is only the default output after installing "numactl" on this machine. > Regards, > Dario Thanks, Stefan Attachment:
xl-info-numa.txt Attachment:
xl-dmesg.txt _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-users
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |