[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Xen-users] How can PV be slower than PVHVM?


  • To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • From: Steffen Einsle <einsle@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2019 13:10:29 +0100
  • Delivery-date: Thu, 17 Jan 2019 12:10:38 +0000
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=simple; s=default; d=phptrix.de; b=fJpYuda70bqyzRWRxFxyDuEWeSiFbfPqgwQGAmh+EXG/uYvWg93kgmUdex4VQ2qzK/yscV4rttp8nfJns7+witszyC7/VaR3eA/UJEq9H3WKEc92AlzAhCwt8PTOdH1qHod3IE/PIx2nUZ+QmHGfFCROFb3pYKRSYaEBPIbhm48=;
  • List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xenproject.org>

Hi there,

after reading the PV vs PVHVM performance comparison at

https://xen-orchestra.com/blog/pv-vs-pvhvm-on-next-xenserver/

but I still cannot accept how a fully emulated system can even come close to the performance of a PV-only system. Every translation layer must add some overhead - right? So a true PV system without translation layer should (imho) be at the top of the performance list?

Or does the mentioned comparison apply only to debian on xen-orchestra?

My system is a barebone gentoo xen 4.10 Dom0 and multiple gentoo PV DomUs in PV mode - and now I'm confused...



_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-users

 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.