| 
    
 [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: website/documentation
 Hi, On 12/08/13 13:05, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote: On 12 Aug 2013, at 12:11, Richard Mortier <Richard.Mortier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: I fixed up the mirage-skeleton/tcp/iperf_self test and got the following output: # grep Iperf out --text Iperf client: Attempting connection. Iperf client: Made connection to server. Iperf server: Received connection.Iperf server: t = 1.000188, rate = 1092481 KBits/s, totbytes = 136585920, live_words = 33461 Iperf server: t = 2.000279, rate = 1094877 KBits/s, totbytes = 273458000, live_words = 69308 Iperf server: t = 3.000629, rate = 1114232 KBits/s, totbytes = 412785800, live_words = 58415 Iperf server: t = 4.002314, rate = 1106742 KBits/s, totbytes = 551361700, live_words = 26693 Iperf server: t = 5.002414, rate = 1131118 KBits/s, totbytes = 692765620, live_words = 25897 Iperf server: t = 6.002414, rate = 1147174 KBits/s, totbytes = 836162440, live_words = 40041 Iperf server: t = 7.002637, rate = 1174664 KBits/s, totbytes = 983028220, live_words = 24499 Iperf server: t = 7.125094, rate = 1122792 KBits/s, totbytes = 1000000000, live_words = 33267 Iperf client: Done. Iperf server: Done - closed connection.The rate looks reasonably stable to me, but I'm not familiar with running this test. Anyone got any ideas? Cheers, Dave 
 
 
  | 
  
![]()  | 
            
         Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our  |