[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [MirageOS-devel] Updating TROVE or maintaining a remote

> On 13 Aug 2015, at 22:02, Daniel BÃnzli <daniel.buenzli@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Le jeudi, 13 aoÃt 2015 Ã 18:59, Amir Chaudhry a Ãcrit :
>> Packages that we do actually use, but do not maintain, can be revealed by 
>> looking at dependencies so is there a need to also tag them with `mirage`?
> You want to use the tag `mirage` with any package that provides specific 
> support for mirage in some way, so that mirage users can browse mirage build 
> blocks in the opam repository. I don't think general purpose pure OCaml 
> libraries should have this tag but those e.g. that expose functors that 
> depend on mirage signatures. Now maybe this tag should be called `mirageos`.

That all makes sense, thanks.

I think 'mirage' is the appropriate tag as we already use that as the prefix 
for some packages and on the command line, so it feels consistent. MirageOS 
(with capitalisation) is what we should use in our comms/writing, though. 

Best wishes,

Sent via mobile
MirageOS-devel mailing list



Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.