Re: [MirageOS-devel] Updating TROVE or maintaining a remote

[Amir Chaudhry <amc79@xxxxxxxxx>]

> On 13 Aug 2015, at 22:02, Daniel BÃnzli <daniel.buenzli@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> Le jeudi, 13 aoÃt 2015 Ã 18:59, Amir Chaudhry a Ãcrit :
>> Packages that we do actually use, but do not maintain, can be revealed by 
>> looking at dependencies so is there a need to also tag them with `mirage`?
> 
> You want to use the tag `mirage` with any package that provides specific 
> support for mirage in some way, so that mirage users can browse mirage build 
> blocks in the opam repository. I don't think general purpose pure OCaml 
> libraries should have this tag but those e.g. that expose functors that 
> depend on mirage signatures. Now maybe this tag should be called `mirageos`.

That all makes sense, thanks.

I think 'mirage' is the appropriate tag as we already use that as the prefix 
for some packages and on the command line, so it feels consistent. MirageOS 
(with capitalisation) is what we should use in our comms/writing, though. 

Best wishes,
Amir

--
Sent via mobile
_______________________________________________
MirageOS-devel mailing list
MirageOS-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mirageos-devel