Re: [MirageOS-devel] putting stuff on the mirage.io blog

[Amir Chaudhry <amc79@xxxxxxxxx>]

I think the point is that if you already know what you're doing, it's not so 
bad. If you're *not* familiar with it, then it can seem fairly complicated 
compared to other static site generators. 

Best wishes,
Amir

--
Sent via mobile

> On 17 Nov 2016, at 16:29, Richard Mortier <richard.mortier@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 
> wrote:
> 
>> On 17 November 2016 at 16:06, Anil Madhavapeddy <anil@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> I also acknowledge that it's a royal pain to build mirage-www locally right 
>> now, so I am working on making it a more lightweight unikernel (by staging 
>> the HTML generation) as part of the MirageOS3 release efforts.  More on that 
>> when I have a working patch :)
>> 
> 
> That sounds good :)
> 
> But I'm curious what's a royal pain in the meantime -- just tried, and
> it seemed to build ok for me against current OPAM remote (ie., no
> mirage-dev) using local OPAM (though the Docker workflow didn't work
> so well).
> 
> -- 
> Richard Mortier
> richard.mortier@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> _______________________________________________
> MirageOS-devel mailing list
> MirageOS-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mirageos-devel


_______________________________________________
MirageOS-devel mailing list
MirageOS-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mirageos-devel