Re: [Publicity] Blog Czar update, week of June 10

[Lars Kurth <lars.kurth@xxxxxxxxxx>]

> I still haven't understood if we're getting a blog post from CentOS people 
> (ping)...
I will upload a draft for Wed roday and KB will modify and publish

> The final implementation ended up being quite a bit different from that (and 
> hence I had to blog about it again :-D). 
> That does not makes it right, or means it has to be like that, just saying it 
> happened before.
That reminds me : did we post something about the implementation that ended up 
in Xen 4.3?

Lars

-----Original Message-----
From: Dario Faggioli [mailto:dario.faggioli@xxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: 17 June 2013 17:35
To: Wei Liu
Cc: publicity@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Karanbir Singh; Lars Kurth; Pasi KÃrkkÃinen
Subject: Re: Blog Czar update, week of June 10

On mar, 2013-06-11 at 18:27 +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > ---- Regarding the future, I have the following people in the 
> > pipeline
> > already:
> >  + Wei Liu (next week)
> >  + Ian Jackson
> >  + Stefano Stabellini
> > 
> > So, guys, do you already have an idea of what you'll write about? 
> > Wei, perhaps something about the performance 
> > investigation/improvement you're working on, as a result of the discussion 
> > we had in Dublin? Let us know.
> > 
> 
> I need to think about it. Would a post about Xen network plan 
> appropariate?
>
I don't know... I wouldn't call it "inappropriate", that's for sure.
Anyway, feel free to propose something different and write a post about it. :-D

> People can find most information on the wiki and mailing list.
>
Well, that is true for almost everything we do... The whole point of the blog 
is not (only) to talk about new and never said stuff, but (also) to put the 
stuff we have in other formats more easily accessible to a wider and broader 
audience. :-)

> Do you think advertising something that has not existed yet the right 
> thing to do? I don't want to give people wrong expectation as many 
> things are still pretty vague...
> 
Well, my first post on the blog about NUMA scheduling etc., contained the plan, 
the long term objective and the first cut of experimental data I collected out 
of a preliminary implementation. The final implementation ended up being quit a 
bit different from that (and hence I had to blog about it again :-D). That does 
not makes it right, or means it has to be like that, just saying it happened 
before.

Anyway, as saying above, it would be nice to have something, if not on this, on 
something else. I still haven't understood if we're getting a blog post from 
CentOS people (ping)... If yes, your (Wei) post will be delayed, if not, we'd 
need it by the end of the week. Tell me if you think it's feasible.

Thanks and Regards,
Dario

--
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, 
Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)

_______________________________________________
Publicity mailing list
Publicity@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity