[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Publicity] Blog post: OSSTest Standalone Mode Step by Step
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 04:58:58PM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 02:17:03PM +0100, Wei Liu wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 12:34:04PM +0100, Lars Kurth wrote: > > > Wei, > > > > > > thanks. I will leave it to others to comment. Would you be willing to put > > > together a wiki page based on the post and post to xen-devel? I had a > > > > Yes, sure. > > > > > conversation with IanC at LinuxCon about the lack of people using OSS > > > Test. > > > I believe the two main reasons for the lack of pick-up so far are: > > > a) It is unclear how to build OSS Test into the dev routine (this post + > > > wiki should address this) > > > > I think it can address part of the problem, but not all of it. There're > > still lots of details I'm not able to go into in a single post. > > > > The sole purpose of this post is to help people bootstrap using OSSTest. > > Once they're en route they're pretty much on their own and everything > > boils down to "read the source code". > > It does detract from the Xen RT which long-term ought to be used (IMHO). > > As it has a ton of features that can help in making Xen and Linux > work fantasticly well - and catch not only bootup/bug regressions > but also performance regressions. > My understanding is that OSSTest and XenRT will co-exist for some time. I personally would like to run some regression tests by myself, in that case OSSTest is quite handy - well, as least for open source Xen developers. I don't know whether Alex forgot to update README -- the last few lines indicates XenRT is still XenServer centric? http://downloadns.citrix.com.edgesuite.net/akdlm/8169/README Wei. > > > > Wei. > > > > > b) We have been broadcasting pleas to use "OSS Test" in a blanket fashion > > > to xen-devel > > > > > > I believe, that we would be more successful, if reviewers could point out > > > to submitters of patches that in a specific patch submission a new OSS > > > Test > > > would be very valuable/appreciated/in their own interest. I also believe > > > that once a submitter has written a couple of tests, they will see the > > > value of OSS Test themselves. > > > > > > In any case, I do not want to cover this in detail on the publicity list. > > > This would be better discussed on xen-devel, but I need a "hook" to kick > > > off the discussion. > > > > > > Lars > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 10:25 AM, Wei Liu <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > Hi all > > > > > > > > I played with OSSTest standalone mode last week and wrote a blog post > > > > about it. Feedbacks welcome! > > > > > > > > http://blog.xen.org/?p=7930&preview=true > > > > > > > > Wei. > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > Publicity mailing list > > > > Publicity@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Publicity mailing list > > Publicity@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity _______________________________________________ Publicity mailing list Publicity@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |