Re: [Publicity] Docker versus Virtual Machines

[Lars Kurth <lars.kurth@xxxxxxxxxx>]

We should run the Rumpkernel piece first. Maybe tomorrow? I need someone
else to pull the trigger, after Antti is done with his piece and happy
That would buy Sarah some time
Lars

On 06/08/2015 14:12, "Stefano Stabellini"
<stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>Hi Sarah,
>
>that makes sense to me. I think it is mostly ready and shouldn't change
>much in next couple of days. Certainly it will be publishable on Monday
>next week.
>
>Cheers,
>
>Stefano
>
>On Thu, 6 Aug 2015, Sarah Conway wrote:
>> Question, when will this run? I'd like to send it to a few reporters in
>>advance. Maybe tee it up for Monday or
>> Tuesday so I can pitch reporters tomorrow and Monday?  I would like to
>>add some promos to the end re: relevant
>> talks at XenDevSummit and CloudOpen too.
>> Sarah 
>> 
>> On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 7:21 AM, Paul Durrant <Paul.Durrant@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>wrote:
>>       > -----Original Message-----
>>       > From: publicity-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:publicity-
>>       > bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Anil Madhavapeddy
>>       > Sent: 06 August 2015 12:13
>>       > To: Stefano Stabellini
>>       > Cc: Lars Kurth; publicity@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>       > Subject: Re: [Publicity] Docker versus Virtual Machines
>>       >
>>       >
>>       > > On 6 Aug 2015, at 10:15, Stefano Stabellini
>>       > <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>       > >
>>       > > On Wed, 5 Aug 2015, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote:
>>       > >> On 5 Aug 2015, at 17:27, Stefano Stabellini
>>       > <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>       > >>>
>>       > >>> On Wed, 5 Aug 2015, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote:
>>       > >>>> On 5 Aug 2015, at 12:27, Stefano Stabellini
>>       > <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>       > >>>>>
>>       > >>>>> Hi all,
>>       > >>>>>
>>       > >>>>> I wrote a "Docker versus Virtual Machines" article for
>>the Xen Project
>>       > >>>>> blog, let me know what you think!
>>       > >>>>>
>>       > >>>>> https://blog.xenproject.org/?p=10910&preview=true
>>       > >>>>
>>       > >>>> I like it all except for the title, which bears no
>>resemblance to the
>>       > >>>> contents of the post (which is about how VMs are
>>complementary to
>>       > >>>> Docker's future).  How about "Docker: meet virtual
>>machines", or
>>       > something
>>       > >>>> similar?
>>       > >>>
>>       > >>> Yes, I think you are right.
>>       > >>> What about "Docker and the future of Virtual Machines"?
>>       > >>
>>       > >> Something a little more specific? "Using Docker as a Virtual
>>Machine
>>       > manager" or something (not quite right).
>>       > >
>>       > > What about starting with the simple question that is phrased
>>at the
>>       > > beginning of the article:
>>       > >
>>       > > "Will Docker replace Virtual Machines?"
>>       >
>>       > Excellent! That sounds good to me.
>>       >
>>       > One epic hack that is a non-native container is Joyent's
>>Linux-ABI-in-Illumos,
>>       > which uses runs Docker Linux containers natively in Illumos:
>>       > https://www.joyent.com/blog/2014-in-review-docker-rising
>>       >
>>       > It's possible to do, appears to be used in production, but is
>>clearly very
>>       > complex.  Unsure how to phrase that in a blog post :-)
>>       >
>> 
>> The concept was around while I was still at Sun ~10 years ago. Google
>>'linux branded zone solaris'. And
>> what was shipped was actually the second iteration of the idea (the
>>first one being very hacky).

_______________________________________________
Publicity mailing list
Publicity@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity