Re: [Publicity] Docker versus Virtual Machines

[Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I guess the Docker piece should be published sometime tomorrow
(Tuesday)?

On Thu, 6 Aug 2015, Lars Kurth wrote:
> We should run the Rumpkernel piece first. Maybe tomorrow? I need someone
> else to pull the trigger, after Antti is done with his piece and happy
> That would buy Sarah some time
> Lars
> 
> On 06/08/2015 14:12, "Stefano Stabellini"
> <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> >Hi Sarah,
> >
> >that makes sense to me. I think it is mostly ready and shouldn't change
> >much in next couple of days. Certainly it will be publishable on Monday
> >next week.
> >
> >Cheers,
> >
> >Stefano
> >
> >On Thu, 6 Aug 2015, Sarah Conway wrote:
> >> Question, when will this run? I'd like to send it to a few reporters in
> >>advance. Maybe tee it up for Monday or
> >> Tuesday so I can pitch reporters tomorrow and Monday?  I would like to
> >>add some promos to the end re: relevant
> >> talks at XenDevSummit and CloudOpen too.
> >> Sarah 
> >> 
> >> On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 7:21 AM, Paul Durrant <Paul.Durrant@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>wrote:
> >>       > -----Original Message-----
> >>       > From: publicity-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:publicity-
> >>       > bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Anil Madhavapeddy
> >>       > Sent: 06 August 2015 12:13
> >>       > To: Stefano Stabellini
> >>       > Cc: Lars Kurth; publicity@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>       > Subject: Re: [Publicity] Docker versus Virtual Machines
> >>       >
> >>       >
> >>       > > On 6 Aug 2015, at 10:15, Stefano Stabellini
> >>       > <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>       > >
> >>       > > On Wed, 5 Aug 2015, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote:
> >>       > >> On 5 Aug 2015, at 17:27, Stefano Stabellini
> >>       > <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>       > >>>
> >>       > >>> On Wed, 5 Aug 2015, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote:
> >>       > >>>> On 5 Aug 2015, at 12:27, Stefano Stabellini
> >>       > <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>       > >>>>>
> >>       > >>>>> Hi all,
> >>       > >>>>>
> >>       > >>>>> I wrote a "Docker versus Virtual Machines" article for
> >>the Xen Project
> >>       > >>>>> blog, let me know what you think!
> >>       > >>>>>
> >>       > >>>>> https://blog.xenproject.org/?p=10910&preview=true
> >>       > >>>>
> >>       > >>>> I like it all except for the title, which bears no
> >>resemblance to the
> >>       > >>>> contents of the post (which is about how VMs are
> >>complementary to
> >>       > >>>> Docker's future).  How about "Docker: meet virtual
> >>machines", or
> >>       > something
> >>       > >>>> similar?
> >>       > >>>
> >>       > >>> Yes, I think you are right.
> >>       > >>> What about "Docker and the future of Virtual Machines"?
> >>       > >>
> >>       > >> Something a little more specific? "Using Docker as a Virtual
> >>Machine
> >>       > manager" or something (not quite right).
> >>       > >
> >>       > > What about starting with the simple question that is phrased
> >>at the
> >>       > > beginning of the article:
> >>       > >
> >>       > > "Will Docker replace Virtual Machines?"
> >>       >
> >>       > Excellent! That sounds good to me.
> >>       >
> >>       > One epic hack that is a non-native container is Joyent's
> >>Linux-ABI-in-Illumos,
> >>       > which uses runs Docker Linux containers natively in Illumos:
> >>       > https://www.joyent.com/blog/2014-in-review-docker-rising
> >>       >
> >>       > It's possible to do, appears to be used in production, but is
> >>clearly very
> >>       > complex.  Unsure how to phrase that in a blog post :-)
> >>       >
> >> 
> >> The concept was around while I was still at Sun ~10 years ago. Google
> >>'linux branded zone solaris'. And
> >> what was shipped was actually the second iteration of the idea (the
> >>first one being very hacky).
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
Publicity mailing list
Publicity@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/publicity