[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [win-pv-devel] [SOLVED] RE: xen net/vif (signed 8.2.0.6) "code 10" / win7
> -----Original Message----- > From: win-pv-devel [mailto:win-pv-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On > Behalf Of Martin Cerveny > Sent: 09 January 2018 12:08 > To: Paul Durrant <Paul.Durrant@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: win-pv-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [win-pv-devel] [SOLVED] RE: xen net/vif (signed 8.2.0.6) "code 10" / > win7 > > Hello. > > On Tue, 9 Jan 2018, Paul Durrant wrote: > >> Sent: 08 January 2018 17:30 > >> Captured/attached "boot" debugview: > >> - when OK > >> - when "xen-network dialog popup say restart needed" > >> - when failed > > > > Thanks Martin. Much more useful... > > > > From the failure case I can see that your guest is running out of grant > > references. I suspect that, what has happened is you've upgraded your > > backend OS and suddenly multi-page storage rings have become available > > in blkback. Your XENVBD driver is then making use of those and stealing > > most of your VM's grant references. XENVIF is then starting up and > > finding it doesn't have sufficient grant references to operate correctly > > and is therefore failing to start. > > > > You have a couple of choices... Either increase your VM's grant frame > > limit (see man xl.cfg for new per-vm parameters in Xen 4.10) or limit > > your storage backend's rings to a lower number of pages (see modinfo > > xen-blkback and look for max_ring_page_order... I suggest setting to 0). > > Yes. This should be that. I extended "max_grant_frames=256" in VM config > (in json in my case, btw. the global settings in /etc/xen/xl.conf does not > work in my case) and it seems to work now (no more errors > "XENBUS|GnttabExpand: fail1 (c000009a)"). > > > Hmm, it may be possible. I am not sure but the problem could be appearing > > after upgrade from Xen4.8.0 + 4.7.9-200.fc24 to Xen4.10.0 + 4.13.9-300.fc27. > > Does anyone tests defaults ? Defaults that we use in XenServer are certainly well tested. For arbitrary upstream combinations, no; it's just too big a matrix. I tend to try to run on the latest Xen and dom0 to try to spot issues, but my testing is clearly going to be quite limited. Cheers, Paul _______________________________________________ win-pv-devel mailing list win-pv-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/win-pv-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |