[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Xen-devel] reiserfs/xfs creation/check problem
Hi, I'm running xen-2.0 with linux-2.4.27 on my laptop. The domain0 runs a mixed debian woody/sarge system, the testdomain is running on debian/sarge. When I try to create a reiserfs filesystem on a block device in the test domain I get an I/O error. Creating an XFS filsystem seems to work, except for an unsupported ioctl, however xfs_check fails. Creating and checking ext3 filesystems works properly. /dev/hda2 in the test domain is mapped to a logical volume on domain0. Running the same commands in domain0 on the LV works fine. Any ideas? thanks: Gabor Output of the programs: kandur2:~# mkfs.xfs /dev/hda2 meta-data=/dev/hda2 isize=256 agcount=8, agsize=6400 blks = sectsz=512 data = bsize=4096 blocks=51200, imaxpct=25 = sunit=0 swidth=0 blks, unwritten=1 naming =version 2 bsize=4096 log =internal log bsize=4096 blocks=1200, version=1 = sectsz=512 sunit=0 blks realtime =none extsz=65536 blocks=0, rtextents=0 ioctl 00001261 not supported by XL blkif kandur2:~# xfs_check /dev/hda2 xfs_check: read failed: Input/output error xfs_check: data size check failed kandur2:~# mkfs.reiserfs -f /dev/hda2 mkfs.reiserfs 3.6.19 (2003 www.namesys.com) A pair of credits: Elena Gryaznova performed testing and benchmarking. Vitaly Fertman wrote fsck for V3 and maintains the reiserfsprogs package now. He wrote librepair, userspace plugins repair code, fsck for V4, and worked on developing libreiser4 and userspace plugins with Umka. Guessing about desired format.. Kernel 2.4.27-xen0 is running. Format 3.6 with standard journal Count of blocks on the device: 51200 Number of blocks consumed by mkreiserfs formatting process: 8213 Blocksize: 4096 Hash function used to sort names: "r5" Journal Size 8193 blocks (first block 18) Journal Max transaction length 1024 inode generation number: 0 UUID: 92ffa0c0-7577-4a26-86eb-1f651a744640 Initializing journal - 0%....20%....40%....60%....80%....100% The problem has occurred looks like a hardware problem. If you have bad blocks, we advise you to get a new hard drive, because once you get one bad block that the disk drive internals cannot hide from your sight,the chances of getting more are generally said to become much higher (precise statistics are unknown to us), and this disk drive is probably not expensive enough for you to you to risk your time and data on it. If you don't want to follow that follow that advice then if you have just a few bad blocks, try writing to the bad blocks and see if the drive remaps the bad blocks (that means it takes a block it has in reserve and allocates it for use for of that block number). If it cannot remap the block, use badblock option (-B) with reiserfs utils to handle this block correctly. bread: Cannot read the block (51199): (Input/output error). Aborted ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: InterSystems CACHE FREE OODBMS DOWNLOAD - A multidimensional database that combines robust object and relational technologies, making it a perfect match for Java, C++,COM, XML, ODBC and JDBC. www.intersystems.com/match8 _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |