[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Xen-devel] Re: x86-64 Net Performance [was: Opteron server and NUMA]

  • To: Alexander Charbonnet <alexander@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Nicholas Lee <emptysands@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 9 Oct 2005 23:07:44 +1300
  • Cc: Ian Pratt <m+Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Delivery-date: Sun, 09 Oct 2005 10:05:11 +0000
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=ho9ALg4E5VIKB84OQTeCHUS285iSO3UMFKA2HEdCCtsbVq+1Sf48Cd3uxuJBXQHWEqSn4/qTOUC0g2g9Ukfl2ZQNoky8ah2dleigBDu4TUiiY8qOu8bGFrGJk07rGdov3JNCIt6QHRsyveZ/y1/HhSckuGqPBbZyxCQlHhlmwHw=
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>

On 10/9/05, Alexander Charbonnet <alexander@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> compiled into Debian's glibc package.  I can recompile and run that test if
> you think it's worth doing.

Very interesting number. Have you tried doing the same tests between
two different domUs or dom0 and a domU of the same type?

If you do recompile you could try the Xen TLS glibc patch. [1]
Although I'm not sure if 64bit Xen will work with this.

[1] http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/XenSpecificGlibc
Nicholas Lee
gpg 8072 4F86 EDCD 4FC1 18EF  5BDD 07B0 9597 6D58 D70C

Xen-devel mailing list



Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.