Xen project Mailing List

[Xen-devel] Re: x86-64 Net Performance [was: Opteron server and NUMA]

To: Alexander Charbonnet <alexander@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

From: Nicholas Lee <emptysands@xxxxxxxxx>

Date: Sun, 9 Oct 2005 23:07:44 +1300

Cc: Ian Pratt <m+Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Delivery-date: Sun, 09 Oct 2005 10:05:11 +0000

Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=ho9ALg4E5VIKB84OQTeCHUS285iSO3UMFKA2HEdCCtsbVq+1Sf48Cd3uxuJBXQHWEqSn4/qTOUC0g2g9Ukfl2ZQNoky8ah2dleigBDu4TUiiY8qOu8bGFrGJk07rGdov3JNCIt6QHRsyveZ/y1/HhSckuGqPBbZyxCQlHhlmwHw=

List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>

On 10/9/05, Alexander Charbonnet <alexander@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > compiled into Debian's glibc package. I can recompile and run that test if > you think it's worth doing. Very interesting number. Have you tried doing the same tests between two different domUs or dom0 and a domU of the same type? If you do recompile you could try the Xen TLS glibc patch. [1] Although I'm not sure if 64bit Xen will work with this. [1] http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/XenSpecificGlibc -- Nicholas Lee http://stateless.geek.nz gpg 8072 4F86 EDCD 4FC1 18EF 5BDD 07B0 9597 6D58 D70C _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

©2013 Xen Project, A Linux Foundation Collaborative Project. All Rights Reserved.
Linux Foundation is a registered trademark of The Linux Foundation.
Xen Project is a trademark of The Linux Foundation.