[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [patch] Lets not put statements with side-effects inside BUG_ON()
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 07:04:01PM +0200, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote: > On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 12:29:12PM +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > > > BUG_ON() is a macro very very similar to assert(), and it's a really bad > > idea in general to put statements with side-effects inside such a construct > > (for example the BUG_ON() could be compiled away for non-debug builds). > > > > The patch below fixes this for the drivers/xen tree. > > I'd like to see this applied, to both Xen and the vanilla kernel; > however, it should be noted that no version of Linux or Xen compiles > BUG_ON() away without evaluating its arguments. but it should be able to ;) yeah I agree it's not a hard bug per se, but something that should be done anyway ;) _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |