[Xen-devel] Re: Re: [PATCH] remove fs/Kconfig from sparse tree in favor of a 1 line patch

[Sean Dague <japh@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 08:57:12AM +0100, Keir Fraser wrote:
> 
> On 12 Jun 2006, at 08:04, Jan Beulich wrote:
> 
> >Exactly. This is the very reason why we would actually want to see 
> >patches/ hold as little stuff as possible.
> 
> patches is only supposed to contain stuff that is actively being merged 
> upstream. I think that is pretty much what we have now (it did get a 
> bit out of control for a while).

Ok, I guess I misunderstood the reason for the patches directory as
something significantly more generic that could be used in other ways.

My bad.

        -Sean

-- 
Sean Dague
IBM Linux Technology Center                     email: japh@xxxxxxxxxx
Open Hypervisor Team                           alt: sldague@xxxxxxxxxx

Attachment: pgpBObk_jQzF9.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel